Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsElectronicsBasicsRepairDesignCADComponentsEquipmentElectrical Engineering
ElectronicsKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Electronics Forum / Electrical Engineering / July 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Unsmoothed car battery charger - is it crap?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Eddie - 07 Jun 2009 19:19 GMT
My car battery is oversized for the car.  The battery is a bit old
but usually works fine.  The battery is flat (I left the lights
on).  

My fancy new modern charger senses a poor battery and only puts in
very little charge.

I used to use a really old charger to charge this battery
successfully.  I opened up the old charger and saw it was only a
transformer and a big rectifier. That's it.  No soothing.

Is this ok for a car battery or is it way too crude?
Tim S - 07 Jun 2009 19:34 GMT
Eddie coughed up some electrons that declared:

> My car battery is oversized for the car.  The battery is a bit old
> but usually works fine.  The battery is flat (I left the lights
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Is this ok for a car battery or is it way too crude?

Well, it always has been OK - never seen a car charger that was anything but
a transformer and some rectifiers - but then I haven't actually bought a
new one for 20 years!

The only concern is for the electronics in the car, but generally the
battery itself will do the smoothing, which only leaves over-voltage to be
a problem, so don't over charge the battery, which would be bad for the
battery anyway.

If you're paranoid you could disconnect the +ve and charge the battery in
isolation.

Cheers

Tim
Eddie - 08 Jun 2009 21:35 GMT
> Eddie coughed up some electrons that declared:
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> was anything but a transformer and some rectifiers - but then
> I haven't actually bought a new one for 20 years!

I'm the OP.  I think my battery charger is over 30 years old!

I took the casing off (rivetted of course) to see the inside:

front  =  http://i44.tinypic.com/wuq7p5.jpg
transformer  =  http://i44.tinypic.com/2dmfsef.jpg
rectifier  =  http://i40.tinypic.com/2i0dnyp.jpg

It sure looks dated!

Eddie

> The only concern is for the electronics in the car, but
> generally the battery itself will do the smoothing, which only
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Cheers
> Tim
Duncan Wood - 08 Jun 2009 21:55 GMT
>> Eddie coughed up some electrons that declared:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>> Cheers
>> Tim

Ooh, I used to have one of those, don't leave it connected for days or  
it'll boil your battery.
Ecnerwal - 08 Jun 2009 23:05 GMT
> I'm the OP.  I think my battery charger is over 30 years old!
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> It sure looks dated!

True, but not a big deal. You might want a new strain relief or grommet
on the power cord before you cut the cord by not using one where it goes
through the case. The quaint power rectifiers are fine until they are
not - if they ever go bad, "modern" replacements are fairly simple to
get. You probably have a much better ammeter than you'll get in any
"modern" charger.

Nothing wrong with old stuff that works.

If you want a smarter charger, you can start here and add smarts,
capacitors, whatever makes you happy - timers, pulsers, voltage
regulators, the works. The base it's built on hasn't changed much in 70
years.

Signature

Cats, coffee, chocolate...vices to live by

James Waldby - 10 Jun 2009 09:49 GMT
>> I'm the OP.  I think my battery charger is over 30 years old!
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> not - if they ever go bad, "modern" replacements are fairly simple to
> get.

Selenium rectifiers are still being manufactured (see eg
<http://www.rectifierindia.com/product/seleniumrectifiers/>, which
refers to a "continuous research and development programme aimed at
reliable, lowcost, compact selenium rectifier elements and stacks")
but I presume you refer instead to silicon diodes.

> You probably have a much better ammeter than you'll get in any
> "modern" charger.
>
> Nothing wrong with old stuff that works.
...

Signature

jiw

Gareth - 07 Jun 2009 20:13 GMT
> My car battery is oversized for the car.  The battery is a bit old
> but usually works fine.  The battery is flat (I left the lights
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Is this ok for a car battery or is it way too crude?

Both; it is crude but it's ok for a car battery.

Signature

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
To reply to me directly:

Replace privacy.net with: totalise DOT co DOT uk and replace me with
gareth.harris

Steve Walker - 07 Jun 2009 20:45 GMT
>> My car battery is oversized for the car.  The battery is a bit old
>> but usually works fine.  The battery is flat (I left the lights
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Both; it is crude but it's ok for a car battery.

Modern "intelligent" chargers are much kinder to the battery and usually
have an automatic maintain mode, so you don't have to remove the charger as
soon as it's charged and can even use them to maintain the charge if the
vehicle is not used for some time. Old fashioned basic chargers will
sometimes recover batteries that an intelligent charger won't charge
though, but if you leave them on too long they'll boil the electrolyte off.
Personally, I use an intelligent charger, but have an old charger to start
the charge on any very flat battery, which I can then complete with the
modern one.

SteveW
castlebravo242@att.net - 07 Jun 2009 20:50 GMT
> My car battery is oversized for the car.  The battery is a bit old
> but usually works fine.  The battery is flat (I left the lights
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Is this ok for a car battery or is it way too crude?

Check the electrolyte level in your battery.Filtered DC causes polarization
of the battery.

Bob
Duncan Wood - 07 Jun 2009 21:17 GMT
>> My car battery is oversized for the car.  The battery is a bit old
>> but usually works fine.  The battery is flat (I left the lights
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Bob

An unpolarised battery isn't much use.
geoff - 07 Jun 2009 22:02 GMT
>>> My car battery is oversized for the car.  The battery is a bit old
>>> but usually works fine.  The battery is flat (I left the lights
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>An unpolarised battery isn't much use.

Dunno - might make a good door stop

Signature

geoff

Duncan Wood - 07 Jun 2009 22:14 GMT
>>>> My car battery is oversized for the car.  The battery is a bit old
>>>> but usually works fine.  The battery is flat (I left the lights
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Dunno - might make a good door stop

Fair point.
Bill - 07 Jun 2009 22:32 GMT
>>An unpolarised battery isn't much use.
>
>Dunno - might make a good door stop

Depends a bit on size.

Last week a VERY large hornet decided to take a stroll across my work
bench.  A 2.8Ah Yuasa flattened it perfectly.  Although I must admit
that it was not unpolarised, the battery that is.

Any one have any other uses for old batteries?

Signature

Bill

PeterD - 08 Jun 2009 13:38 GMT
>>>An unpolarised battery isn't much use.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>Any one have any other uses for old batteries?

Yes, when religion peddlers come to the door, they make great things
to throw.

"But, I didn't see that guy standing there, sorry!" <bg>

BTW, don't unpolarized batteries just provide AC? And if that's the
case, how do you specifiy 50 or 60 Hz?
keithw86@gmail.com - 08 Jun 2009 16:19 GMT
> >In message <26i1ZWiMrCLKF...@demon.co.uk>, geoff <ra...@kateda.org>
> >writes
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> BTW, don't unpolarized batteries just provide AC?

Yes.  0VAC

> And if that's the case, how do you specifiy 50 or 60 Hz?

0VAC 50/60Hz.

Of course, in Spice they can deliver whatever voltage/frequency you
want.  No need to worry about the little details of thermodynamics
either.
Robert Baer - 08 Jun 2009 17:52 GMT
>>>>An unpolarised battery isn't much use.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> BTW, don't unpolarized batteries just provide AC? And if that's the
> case, how do you specifiy 50 or 60 Hz?
...that is how fast it tumbles when thrown?
geoff - 08 Jun 2009 22:00 GMT
>>>>An unpolarised battery isn't much use.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>BTW, don't unpolarized batteries just provide AC? And if that's the
>case, how do you specifiy 50 or 60 Hz?

The further you drop it, the more it hurts ...

Signature

geoff

Adam Aglionby - 07 Jun 2009 22:38 GMT
> >> My car battery is oversized for the car.  The battery is a bit old
> >> but usually works fine.  The battery is flat (I left the lights
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> An unpolarised battery isn't much use.

An AC battery would be darn handy...

Adam
Duncan Wood - 07 Jun 2009 22:40 GMT
>> >> My car battery is oversized for the car.  The battery is a bit old
>> >> but usually works fine.  The battery is flat (I left the lights
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Adam

You've not met Radioheads big battery have you :-)
Eddie - 07 Jun 2009 21:31 GMT
On 7 Jun 2009 20:50,  wrote:

>> My car battery is oversized for the car.  The battery is a
>> bit old but usually works fine.  The battery is flat (I left
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Bob

It's a sealed battery.  Are they better or worse than electrolyte
batteries when the charge drops to very low?
Duncan Wood - 07 Jun 2009 21:35 GMT
> On 7 Jun 2009 20:50,  wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> It's a sealed battery.  Are they better or worse than electrolyte
> batteries when the charge drops to very low?

Similar, the difference is when they're overcharged , but any battery with  
a high CCA compared to it's capacity won't like being hard discharged.  
Boost it for a few hours on the old charger, charge it up on a decent one  
or by driving the car & see if it's still happy.
Robert Baer - 08 Jun 2009 01:29 GMT
> On 7 Jun 2009 20:50,  wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> It's a sealed battery.  Are they better or worse than electrolyte
> batteries when the charge drops to very low?
  Sealed batteries use a gelled electolyte, and so the charge rate must
be limited to prevent outgassing.
  Within that limit, they are supposed to tolerate extended charging
times because the internal chemistry changes some to compensate.
Dave Plowman (News) - 08 Jun 2009 09:27 GMT
> > It's a sealed battery.  Are they better or worse than electrolyte
> > batteries when the charge drops to very low?
>    Sealed batteries use a gelled electolyte, and so the charge rate must
> be limited to prevent outgassing.

Although they're called sealed, car batteries are actually low maintenance
types which are still wet. Some serious off roaders may use SLA - but
don't know of any car which does.

>    Within that limit, they are supposed to tolerate extended charging
> times because the internal chemistry changes some to compensate.

Signature

*Never test the depth of the water with both feet.*

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Duncan Wood - 08 Jun 2009 11:47 GMT
>> > It's a sealed battery.  Are they better or worse than electrolyte
>> > batteries when the charge drops to very low?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> types which are still wet. Some serious off roaders may use SLA - but
> don't know of any car which does.

MX5s IIRC
James Sweet - 09 Jun 2009 02:42 GMT
>>> It's a sealed battery.  Are they better or worse than electrolyte
>>> batteries when the charge drops to very low?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> types which are still wet. Some serious off roaders may use SLA - but
> don't know of any car which does.

Optima sells SLA batteries intended for vehicles. I don't know of any
car manufacture that uses one as the OEM battery, but I've seen plenty
of them in cars. Whether they have any real advantage over conventional
low maintenance automotive batteries in that application, I don't know.
Dave Plowman (News) - 09 Jun 2009 10:44 GMT
> > Although they're called sealed, car batteries are actually low maintenance
> > types which are still wet. Some serious off roaders may use SLA - but
> > don't know of any car which does.

> Optima sells SLA batteries intended for vehicles. I don't know of any
> car manufacture that uses one as the OEM battery, but I've seen plenty
> of them in cars. Whether they have any real advantage over conventional
> low maintenance automotive batteries in that application, I don't know.

I don't think Optima is SLA - ie gel electrolytic. It's wet but spill
proof.

http://www.optimabattery.co.uk/english_optima/technical.htm

Love all the blurb about how long they last. If only they backed that up
with a warranty.

Signature

*For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism *

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Michael A. Terrell - 09 Jun 2009 17:53 GMT
> > > Although they're called sealed, car batteries are actually low maintenance
> > > types which are still wet. Some serious off roaders may use SLA - but
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>     Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
>                   To e-mail, change noise into sound.

  http://www.interstateallbattery.com/vehicle_batteries.htm says their
Optima batteries are not gel cell.

Signature

You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!

Ecnerwal - 09 Jun 2009 18:46 GMT
>    http://www.interstateallbattery.com/vehicle_batteries.htm says their
> Optima batteries are not gel cell.

Likely AGM. Gel is a gelled electolyte (seems obvious), and the gel can
have holes blown in it (from gas bubbles) when unhappy charging events
occur. The holes don't heal.

AGM is a liquid electolye Absorbed in a Glass Mat. If bubbling happens,
it can "heal" - though if too much bubbling happens, the valve will open
to release the pressure (Valve Regulated Lead Acid, or VRLA, rather than
"sealed" in a minor technical sense) - you can't put water back in, so
gassing is best avoided, or the battery dies soon afterwards.

Signature

Cats, coffee, chocolate...vices to live by

Michael A. Terrell - 09 Jun 2009 19:34 GMT
> >    http://www.interstateallbattery.com/vehicle_batteries.htm says their
> > Optima batteries are not gel cell.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> "sealed" in a minor technical sense) - you can't put water back in, so
> gassing is best avoided, or the battery dies soon afterwards.

  Interstate claims they can be installed upside down so if they vent,
it will cause lots of problems.

Signature

You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!

Dave Plowman (News) - 09 Jun 2009 19:21 GMT
> > > Optima sells SLA batteries intended for vehicles. I don't know of
> > > any car manufacture that uses one as the OEM battery, but I've seen
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> > Love all the blurb about how long they last. If only they backed that
> > up with a warranty.

>    http://www.interstateallbattery.com/vehicle_batteries.htm says their
> Optima batteries are not gel cell.

Right - thanks for that. In the UK Optima cost about 4 times a decent
other make for cars - so to me are basically a con. Unless they lasted 4
times as long - and backed it up with a warranty.

Signature

*(over a sketch of the titanic) "The boat sank - get over it

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Michael A. Terrell - 09 Jun 2009 19:33 GMT
> > > > Optima sells SLA batteries intended for vehicles. I don't know of
> > > > any car manufacture that uses one as the OEM battery, but I've seen
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> other make for cars - so to me are basically a con. Unless they lasted 4
> times as long - and backed it up with a warranty.

  These are sold for off road use where you may roll the vehicle, and
race cars for the lower weight.  They are more expensive than some
batteries, but the conventional types have gone sky high, as well.

Signature

You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!

Dave Plowman (News) - 09 Jun 2009 23:52 GMT
> > Right - thanks for that. In the UK Optima cost about 4 times a decent
> > other make for cars - so to me are basically a con. Unless they lasted 4
> > times as long - and backed it up with a warranty.

>    These are sold for off road use where you may roll the vehicle, and
> race cars for the lower weight.  They are more expensive than some
> batteries, but the conventional types have gone sky high, as well.

Talking about UK prices they're even more sky high. And are advertised
here as being a viable alternative for ordinary car use. But they're not.
As regards the weight thing they may be lower weight - but they are also
lower capacity in terms of A/hr for all but the smallest cars.

Signature

*Indian Driver - Smoke signals only*

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

krw - 09 Jun 2009 23:43 GMT
>> > > Optima sells SLA batteries intended for vehicles. I don't know of
>> > > any car manufacture that uses one as the OEM battery, but I've seen
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>other make for cars - so to me are basically a con. Unless they lasted 4
>times as long - and backed it up with a warranty.

My 2001 truck battery is the original.  Why do I care if it'll last
four times longer?
Dave Plowman (News) - 10 Jun 2009 10:00 GMT
> >Right - thanks for that. In the UK Optima cost about 4 times a decent
> >other make for cars - so to me are basically a con. Unless they lasted 4
> >times as long - and backed it up with a warranty.

> My 2001 truck battery is the original.  Why do I care if it'll last
> four times longer?

Indeed - that sort of life isn't uncommon these days for a quality
battery. Which makes Optima's claims even more ludicrous.

Signature

*I want it all and I want it delivered

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

James Sweet - 10 Jun 2009 02:58 GMT
>>>> Optima sells SLA batteries intended for vehicles. I don't know of
>>>> any car manufacture that uses one as the OEM battery, but I've seen
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> other make for cars - so to me are basically a con. Unless they lasted 4
> times as long - and backed it up with a warranty.

It's the same way here.

They are backed by a warranty, but I don't think they have a great
advantage for the typical driver. Seems like they'd be a good buy for a
serious 4x4 though, not my cup of tea but some of those guys do some
pretty crazy stuff, angles and water submersion that would be hard on an
ordinary automotive battery.

I've seen banks of them used in a few electric car conversions as well.
Jasen Betts - 04 Jul 2009 11:35 GMT
>> On 7 Jun 2009 20:50,  wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>    Sealed batteries use a gelled electolyte, and so the charge rate must
> be limited to prevent outgassing.

Gel electrolyte batteries use gel electrolyte,

There are wet batteries marketed as sealed. These typically have no user
accessable ports to access the electrolyte, but will still leak if inverted
etc..

"zero-maintenance" car batteries often have the electolyte ports under
the label.

>    Within that limit, they are supposed to tolerate extended charging
> times because the internal chemistry changes some to compensate.

yeah they have a catylist that oxidises most of the free hydrogen back
to water. as long as you don't overheat them they can tolerate some
overcharging.
Dave Plowman (News) - 08 Jun 2009 00:02 GMT
> My car battery is oversized for the car.  The battery is a bit old
> but usually works fine.  The battery is flat (I left the lights
> on).  

> My fancy new modern charger senses a poor battery and only puts in
> very little charge.

> I used to use a really old charger to charge this battery
> successfully.  I opened up the old charger and saw it was only a
> transformer and a big rectifier. That's it.  No soothing.

> Is this ok for a car battery or is it way too crude?

An ancient crude charger is actually quite good at recovering a flat and
possibly sulphated battery - it will output quite a high voltage with a
high impedance load, which is needed to help combat the sulphation.
However, after the battery has started to take a reasonable charge rate,
ditch it and use your modern one.

Signature

*Would a fly without wings be called a walk?

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Redwood - 08 Jun 2009 09:32 GMT
>> My car battery is oversized for the car.  The battery is a bit old
>> but usually works fine.  The battery is flat (I left the lights
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> However, after the battery has started to take a reasonable charge rate,
> ditch it and use your modern one.

I keep one just for that purpose & then connect the new fangled smart
charger soon as the batt can take it.  From experience though, if connecting
a totally flat batt get ready to switch off the old charger before the
needle goes off the scale followed by a big bang as the bridge rectifier
decides its had enough!!
Dave Plowman (News) - 08 Jun 2009 09:45 GMT
> I keep one just for that purpose & then connect the new fangled smart
> charger soon as the batt can take it.  From experience though, if
> connecting a totally flat batt get ready to switch off the old charger
> before the needle goes off the scale followed by a big bang as the
> bridge rectifier decides its had enough!!

My ancient one has a series resistor to limit the current - and has both
mains and DC fuses.

Signature

*Letting a cat out of the bag is easier than putting it back in *

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Michael A. Terrell - 08 Jun 2009 10:09 GMT
> > I keep one just for that purpose & then connect the new fangled smart
> > charger soon as the batt can take it.  From experience though, if
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> My ancient one has a series resistor to limit the current - and has both
> mains and DC fuses.

  The one I built in the '60s has a Variac to set the charging current,
ot float voltage.

Signature

You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!

Jasen Betts - 04 Jul 2009 11:42 GMT
>> > I keep one just for that purpose & then connect the new fangled smart
>> > charger soon as the batt can take it.  From experience though, if
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>    The one I built in the '60s has a Variac to set the charging current,
> ot float voltage.

how do you deal with mains fluctuations?
Michael A. Terrell - 04 Jul 2009 20:18 GMT
> >    The one I built in the '60s has a Variac to set the charging current,
> > ot float voltage.
>
> how do you deal with mains fluctuations?

  How do you do it with any battery charger?  Hint: You don't.  It
would require the AC line to be well out of tolerance, either high or
low before the charging current would change more than a few percent.
That is what a transformer does.  I used a 24 volt 15 amp transformer
after the variac.  That reduces the change in line voltage by a factor
of 5 to 1.  The variac raises it to around 7 to one at the five amp
charge rate I use most of the time, so the line voltage would have to go
up to 128.4 for a 1% rise in the transformer's secondary voltage.  The
change in charging current is quite small.

  If the battery is quite low, or dying I have a garage type charger
that will start most car engines, even with no battery in the vehicle.
It has no adjustments, other than a mechanical timer to set the charge
time.

Signature

You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!

Too_Many_Tools - 04 Jul 2009 21:23 GMT
On Jul 4, 2:18 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net>
wrote:

> > >    The one I built in the '60s has a Variac to set the charging current,
> > > ot float voltage.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> --
> You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!

LOL...you have no idea what you are talking about.

TMT
Michael A. Terrell - 04 Jul 2009 22:25 GMT
> On Jul 4, 2:18 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> TMT

  Yawn
Signature

You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!

Proteus IIV - 06 Jul 2009 04:34 GMT
On Jul 4, 5:25 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net>
wrote:

> > On Jul 4, 2:18 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net>
> > wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

I THINK SAW YOU AT THE FIREWERX DISPLAY

BURRRRRRP

I AM PROTEUS
Eddie - 08 Jun 2009 21:26 GMT
>>> My car battery is oversized for the car.  The battery is a
>>> bit old but usually works fine.  The battery is flat (I left
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> scale followed by a big bang as the bridge rectifier decides
> its had enough!!

I'm the OP. Oddly enough when I used my old charger on the almost
flat low maintenance battery, the ammeter needle hardly moved at
all.

After a few minutes the needle was about midway on the scale where
it more or less stayed for a few hours.

What was happening?  Didn't see any great rush of current as you
might have once had!

PHOTOS:
front = http://i44.tinypic.com/wuq7p5.jpg
transformer = http://i44.tinypic.com/2dmfsef.jpg
rectifier = http://i40.tinypic.com/2i0dnyp.jpg
Dave Platt - 08 Jun 2009 22:25 GMT
>I'm the OP. Oddly enough when I used my old charger on the almost
>flat low maintenance battery, the ammeter needle hardly moved at
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>What was happening?  Didn't see any great rush of current as you
>might have once had!

That sounds like a classic symptom of the battery being badly sulphated.

Lead-acid batteries run on... well, lead and (sulphuric) acid.  The
electrochemical reaction which produces current, is one in which the
lead reacts with the acid. converting the lead to lead sulphate.  When
you re-charge the battery, the reaction is reversed... the lead
sulphate is broken up into lead (metallic) and sulphate ion, which
goes back into the electrolyte to once again form sulphuric acid.

The lead sulphate which is formed during discharge has a couple of
different crystal forms.  The initial deposition of sulphate isn't too
difficult to dissolve... but it converts spontaneously to a different
crystal form which is hard, difficult to dissolve, and forms an
effective insulator.

I think that's what happened to your battery.  When you initially
tried to recharge it, the plates were covered with a uniform layer of
lead sulphate, and were thus well insulated from one another.  Very
little current could flow.  After a few minutes, the relatively high
voltage from the old-style charger managed to break down some of the
sulphate layer, allowing an increase in the current flow.

There are techniques and devices on the market which are intended to
reverse the sulphation of batteries.  They usually involve some form
of high-voltage pulse charging, sometimes using an inductive "tank"
circuit to create very short radio-frequency pulses.  This is supposed
to break down the insoluble sulphate crystals.  Some people swear by
these devices, other people swear that they're useless.

Deep-discharging most car batteries (low-maintenance or otherwise) is
usually said to be very bad for them.  The extensive conversion of
lead to lead sulphate (and then back again) damages the structure of
the lead plates, and the plates begin to crumble and disintegrate,
greatly shortening the battery's lifetime.

Signature

Dave Platt <dplatt@radagast.org>                                   AE6EO
Friends of Jade Warrior home page:  http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior
 I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will
    boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads!

JosephKK - 09 Jun 2009 13:13 GMT
>>I'm the OP. Oddly enough when I used my old charger on the almost
>>flat low maintenance battery, the ammeter needle hardly moved at
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>the lead plates, and the plates begin to crumble and disintegrate,
>greatly shortening the battery's lifetime.

I can't remember for how long i have known that deep cycling was bas
for lead-acid batteries, it is nice to have some insight into the
damage process.
Dave Plowman (News) - 09 Jun 2009 13:59 GMT
> >Deep-discharging most car batteries (low-maintenance or otherwise) is
> >usually said to be very bad for them.  The extensive conversion of
> >lead to lead sulphate (and then back again) damages the structure of
> >the lead plates, and the plates begin to crumble and disintegrate,
> >greatly shortening the battery's lifetime.

> I can't remember for how long i have known that deep cycling was bas
> for lead-acid batteries, it is nice to have some insight into the
> damage process.

I remember buying an AC Delco battery years ago - and it had a three year
unconditional warranty if used on a car, but only one if used in a golf
buggy, etc.

Signature

 

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

GregS - 09 Jun 2009 15:12 GMT
>>I'm the OP. Oddly enough when I used my old charger on the almost
>>flat low maintenance battery, the ammeter needle hardly moved at
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>the lead plates, and the plates begin to crumble and disintegrate,
>greatly shortening the battery's lifetime.

I have resurected some batteries that have sit around that initially soak very
little input current. I have left it go for a week sometimes. I need to try
that with some old gel cells I have. After overcharging them, they partially clear
up the sulfation. I mostly use deep discharge
batteries in the truck. They seem to hold up better after complete
discharge, while the truck sits for long periods. The thicker
plates seem to last longer. I keep thinking of hooking
up that solar cell charger but never have yet.

greg
James Sweet - 10 Jun 2009 02:55 GMT
> I have resurected some batteries that have sit around that initially soak very
> little input current. I have left it go for a week sometimes. I need to try
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> greg
>  

They do hold up better, you can still kill them, but deep cycle
batteries tend to have solid plates which are much more resistant to
damage from sulfation, they do however have a much lower capacity to
begin with due to the lower surface area vs the porous plates.
Duncan Wood - 10 Jun 2009 06:44 GMT
>>  I have resurected some batteries that have sit around that initially  
>> soak very
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> damage from sulfation, they do however have a much lower capacity to  
> begin with due to the lower surface area vs the porous plates.

Actually the capicity is similar, it's the peak current that you
compromise on.
JosephKK - 11 Jun 2009 14:34 GMT
>> I have resurected some batteries that have sit around that initially soak very
>> little input current. I have left it go for a week sometimes. I need to try
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>damage from sulfation, they do however have a much lower capacity to
>begin with due to the lower surface area vs the porous plates.

It is more a matter of degree rather than a sharp distinction from
what i have been able to find of the details.
StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt - 08 Jun 2009 00:09 GMT
>My car battery is oversized for the car.  The battery is a bit old
>but usually works fine.  The battery is flat (I left the lights
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>Is this ok for a car battery or is it way too crude?

 Electrons are electrons to the battery.  If they are at high enough
potential to cause a charge condition on the battery, they will.
Robert Baer - 08 Jun 2009 01:35 GMT
>>My car battery is oversized for the car.  The battery is a bit old
>>but usually works fine.  The battery is flat (I left the lights
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>   Electrons are electrons to the battery.  If they are at high enough
> potential to cause a charge condition on the battery, they will.
  Well!!!
  My electrons are smaller than your electrons; take THAT!!
Eddie - 08 Jun 2009 21:30 GMT
>> My car battery is oversized for the car.  The battery is a
>> bit old but usually works fine.  The battery is flat (I left
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>   enough potential to cause a charge condition on the battery,
>   they will.

I was kind of worrying that unsmoothed AC might not be too good for
the battery.
Duncan Wood - 08 Jun 2009 21:51 GMT
>>> My car battery is oversized for the car.  The battery is a
>>> bit old but usually works fine.  The battery is flat (I left
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> I was kind of worrying that unsmoothed AC might not be too good for
> the battery.

That's what the diodes are for, it never actually alternates.
StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt - 09 Jun 2009 00:26 GMT
>>> My car battery is oversized for the car.  The battery is a
>>> bit old but usually works fine.  The battery is flat (I left
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>I was kind of worrying that unsmoothed AC might not be too good for
>the battery.

 You said you saw a diode, so how is it that you forgot that it is NOT
AC?
James Sweet - 09 Jun 2009 02:44 GMT
>>> My car battery is oversized for the car.  The battery is a
>>> bit old but usually works fine.  The battery is flat (I left
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> I was kind of worrying that unsmoothed AC might not be too good for
> the battery.

It's not unsmoothed AC, it's unsmoothed DC. The battery doesn't care.
Robert Baer - 08 Jun 2009 01:24 GMT
> My car battery is oversized for the car.  The battery is a bit old
> but usually works fine.  The battery is flat (I left the lights
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Is this ok for a car battery or is it way too crude?
  Actually, that is *better*; the pulses tend to de-sulphate the battery.
daestrom - 08 Jun 2009 23:36 GMT
> My car battery is oversized for the car.  The battery is a bit old
> but usually works fine.  The battery is flat (I left the lights
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Is this ok for a car battery or is it way too crude?

Not *too* many years ago (mid 70's), my dad had to retire his battery
charger.  The filament for the edison valve finally burned out and there are
no replacements.

120 VAC to a transformer with two secondary windings.  One powered valve
filament, the other when to cathode and positive cable.  Negative cable came
from plate of the 'valve'.

Worked fine for many years (originally purchased by my grandfather back in
the 20's or 30's).

daestrom
P.S.  Mind you, you did have to keep an eye on the battery and when it
started bubbling/boiling, it was time to shut it off (big ole rotary
snapswitch on the line side)
James Sweet - 09 Jun 2009 02:47 GMT
>> My car battery is oversized for the car.  The battery is a bit old
>> but usually works fine.  The battery is flat (I left the lights
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> Worked fine for many years (originally purchased by my grandfather back
> in the 20's or 30's).

Of course by then the tube (valve) could have easily been replaced by a
modern silicon rectifier.
daestrom - 10 Jun 2009 01:20 GMT
>>> My car battery is oversized for the car.  The battery is a bit old
>>> but usually works fine.  The battery is flat (I left the lights
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> Of course by then the tube (valve) could have easily been replaced by a
> modern silicon rectifier.

Yes, it certainly could have been upgraded.  But then you wouldn't get to
see the light from across the garage bay :-)

Besides the newer charger had some nice features that are pretty standard
now, like reverse polarity protection and trickle finish.

daestrom
Grimly Curmudgeon - 15 Jun 2009 14:05 GMT
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember "daestrom" <daestrom@twcny.rr.com>
saying something like:

>Not *too* many years ago (mid 70's), my dad had to retire his battery
>charger.  The filament for the edison valve finally burned out and there are
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>Worked fine for many years (originally purchased by my grandfather back in
>the 20's or 30's).

Would have been a simple job to put in a normal solid state rectifier,
just to keep a historically interesting bit of kit working.
Otoh, valve rectifiers are still being made in China, afaik.
Archimedes' Lever - 16 Jun 2009 00:24 GMT
>We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
>drugs began to take hold. I remember "daestrom" <daestrom@twcny.rr.com>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>just to keep a historically interesting bit of kit working.
>Otoh, valve rectifiers are still being made in China, afaik.

 They are still being made in a lot of places.  Likely just not the one
he was wanting.
Proteus IIV - 16 Jun 2009 01:51 GMT
On Jun 15, 7:24 pm, Archimedes' Lever <OneBigLe...@InfiniteSeries.Org>
wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:05:31 +0100, Grimly Curmudgeon
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

EAT EXCREMENT TROLL

I AM PROTEUS
Dave Plowman (News) - 16 Jun 2009 10:37 GMT
> >Would have been a simple job to put in a normal solid state rectifier,
> >just to keep a historically interesting bit of kit working.
> >Otoh, valve rectifiers are still being made in China, afaik.

>   They are still being made in a lot of places.  Likely just not the one
> he was wanting.

They're certainly still made for supplying the HT to valve amps etc - but
for high current low voltage? Wouldn't have thought there was much demand.

Signature

*Marathon runners with bad footwear suffer the agony of defeat*

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Archimedes' Lever - 17 Jun 2009 01:43 GMT
>> >Would have been a simple job to put in a normal solid state rectifier,
>> >just to keep a historically interesting bit of kit working.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>They're certainly still made for supplying the HT to valve amps etc - but
>for high current low voltage? Wouldn't have thought there was much demand.

 Solid state is more efficient.
John G. - 17 Jun 2009 05:53 GMT
>>> >Would have been a simple job to put in a normal solid state rectifier,
>>> >just to keep a historically interesting bit of kit working.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>  Solid state is more efficient.

Tungar rectifiers are certainly less efficient but they cannot be directly
replaced by semiconductors because the voltage drop is much different,
several volts for a Tungar and the charger would then produce too hi an
output voltage.

John G.
Michael A. Terrell - 17 Jun 2009 09:30 GMT
> >>> >Would have been a simple job to put in a normal solid state rectifier,
> >>> >just to keep a historically interesting bit of kit working.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> several volts for a Tungar and the charger would then produce too hi an
> output voltage.

  That is why he is called 'dimbulb' or 'Always Wrong', no matter which
ignorant nym he trolls with:

Abbey Somebody <abnormal@castlefrankenstein.org>
AnimalMagic <AnimalMagic@petersbackyard.org>
Archimedes' Lever <OneBigLever@InfiniteSeries.Org>
Bart! <B@rt_The_Sheriff_Is_A_Nig**!.org>
Bungalow Bill <BugalowBill@AbbeyRoad.UKCOM>

Capt. Cave Man <ItIsSoEasyACaveManCanDoIt@upyers.org>
ChairmanOfTheBored <RUBored@crackasmile.org>
Chieftain of the Carpet Crawlers
<theslipperman@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org>
Corbomite Carrie <Corbomite@maneuver.org>
DarkMatter <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org>

Do I really need to say? <rael@thescree.org>
Dorothy with the Red Shoes on <Dorothy@notinkansas.org>
Dr. Heywood R. Floyd <Heywood@thebarattheendofthemonolith.org>
FatBytestard <FatBytestard@somewheronyourharddrive.org>
FunkyPunk FieldEffectTrollsistor <FunkShunPoignter@yermomma.org>

FunkyPunk FieldEffectTrollsistor <FunkShunPointer@yermomma.org>
GoldIntermetallicEmbrittlement
<GoldIntermetallicEmbrittlement@youdontknowjack.org>
Hattori Hanzo <OutintheSnow@billsbackyard.org>
Herbert John \Jackie\" Gleason" <BufordTJustice@Texarkanacops.gov>
HiggsField <higgdfield@whutthableapduyoukno.org>

IAmTheSlime <TheSlimeFromYourVideo@oozingacrossyourlivingroomfloor.org>
ItsASecretDummy <secretasianman@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org>
LargeMarge <LargeMarge@thetentwoposition.org>
MadManMoon <TheWholePlanetIsMine@hereandnow.org>
MakeNoAttemptToAdjustYourSet <DoNotAttemptToAdjustYourSet@anytime.org>

MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org
<MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org>
Mr.Eko <ekointhedirt@lostisland.org>
Mr. Haney <mrhaney@thebarattheendofthefarmroad.org>
Mycelium <myceliumgrows@underyourshrooms.org>
Neanderthal <dance@gottafindawomanrighton.org>

Phat Bytestard <PhatBytestard@getinmahharddrive.org>
RoyLFuchs <RoyLFuchs@urfargingicehole.org>
SkyPilot <somewhere@theedgeofspace.org>
SoothSayer <SaySooth@TheMonastery.org>
Spurious Response <SpuriousResponse@cleansignal.org>

StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt <Zarathustra@thusspoke.org>
Sum Ting Wong
<SumTingWong@thebarattheendoftheVenusianLightnigBoltmonolith.org>
SuspendedInGaffa <suspendedingaffa@kateshouse.org>
The Great Attractor
<SuperM@ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org>
TheGlimmerMan <justaglimmer@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org>

TheKraken <ReachUpandSuckYouDowntotheDepths@yup.org>
The Last Mimsy <mimsy@TheOtherSideoftheLookingGlass.org>
TheQuickBrownFox <thequickbrownfox@overthelazydog.org>
"TutAmongUs@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org"
<TutAmongUs@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org>
UltimatePatriot <UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org>

UpGrade <UpGrade@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org>
ValleyGirl <LuvYerNailz@LikeIWouldGiveIt.Comeon>

Signature

You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!

Archimedes' Lever - 18 Jun 2009 04:12 GMT
>> >>> >Would have been a simple job to put in a normal solid state rectifier,
>> >>> >just to keep a historically interesting bit of kit working.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>   That is why he is called 'dimbulb' or 'Always Wrong', no matter which
>ignorant nym he trolls with:

 We were having a conversation, not a pissing match, you retarded twit.
Richard Cranium - 18 Jun 2009 04:35 GMT
<<<<<Snip>>>>>

>>   That is why he is called 'dimbulb' or 'Always Wrong', no matter which
>>ignorant nym he trolls with:
>
>  We were having a conversation, not a pissing match, you retarded twit.

There is no conversation possible with you Archie; it's always a
pissing match because of your foul mouth.  And you are always the one
being pissed on.

Are you ready to explain your statement of celibacy yet?
Michael A. Terrell - 18 Jun 2009 04:58 GMT
> <<<<<Snip>>>>>
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Are you ready to explain your statement of celibacy yet?

  isn't it obvious?  Nothing on earth is desperate enough to get laid,
that they will stoop to dimbulb's level.

Signature

You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!

Archimedes' Lever - 18 Jun 2009 03:51 GMT
>>>> >Would have been a simple job to put in a normal solid state rectifier,
>>>> >just to keep a historically interesting bit of kit working.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
>John G.

 Diode stacks have bigger drops.
John G. - 18 Jun 2009 04:06 GMT
>>>>> >Would have been a simple job to put in a normal solid state
>>>>> >rectifier,
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
>  Diode stacks have bigger drops.

With a forward drop of something like 0.7 volts how many do you need in a
stack to get towards the 6 or 7 volts forward drop of a tungar and why would
you need a stack to get a reverse voltge of a mere 20 volts.?

John G.
Archimedes' Lever - 18 Jun 2009 04:40 GMT
>>>>>> >Would have been a simple job to put in a normal solid state
>>>>>> >rectifier,
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
>John G.

 You don't "need" a stack, but if you "need" to drop volts, and you are
using a diode, you need a stack, no?

 Our HV diodes, though not capable of such currents, dropped as much as
20 volts.  There are like 60 series elements in an HV diode that drops
that much.
John G. - 18 Jun 2009 05:14 GMT
>>>>>>> >Would have been a simple job to put in a normal solid state
>>>>>>> >rectifier,
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> 20 volts.  There are like 60 series elements in an HV diode that drops
> that much.
Just in case you did not read what we are talking about..
It was replacing Tungar rectifiers in battery chargers.

Battery chargers rarely need 60 series elements to make a HV stack and whats
more your 60 diodes would not be much good for 6 amps.
Please try and stay on topic.

John G.
Archimedes' Lever - 18 Jun 2009 06:59 GMT
>>>>>>>> >Would have been a simple job to put in a normal solid state
>>>>>>>> >rectifier,
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>
>John G.

 We do not need to drop 20 volts so 60 would not be needed.  I was
merely telling you about how HV diodes have a high voltage drop.

For a few volts, it would obviously by a smaller stack, AND of course
one would use diodes that CAN handle higher currents.

 Stop trying to officiate like the retards think they do, and YOU stay
on the f.cking topic, jackass.
John G. - 18 Jun 2009 07:12 GMT
>>>>> On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:53:45 +1000, "John G."
>>>>> <greentest@ozemail.com.au>
[quoted text clipped - 61 lines]
>  Stop trying to officiate like the retards think they do, and YOU stay
> on the f.cking topic, jackass.

I thought this was about Battery chargers and not f******.

A SMALLER stack would of course be just ONE diode (or 2 or 4 in other
arrangements), even for  a supply voltage of much more than 20.

John G.
Archimedes' Lever - 18 Jun 2009 09:41 GMT
>>>>>> On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:53:45 +1000, "John G."
>>>>>> <greentest@ozemail.com.au>
[quoted text clipped - 63 lines]
>
>I thought this was about Battery chargers and not f******.

 Don't be f.cking brainless.

>A SMALLER stack would of course be just ONE diode (or 2 or 4 in other
>arrangements), even for  a supply voltage of much more than 20.

 No.  THAT would be an ARRAY of diodes, in a half or full wave bridge.

 A STACK IS a stack.  There is only one configuration, SERIES.  Stack
until The desired Voltage potential handling capacity has been
sufficiently exceeded (for the HV application), OR stack until the
desired voltage drop has been reached in the case of needing a drop in
your circuit.

 ONE diode is NOT ANY kind of stack at all, so there is no "of course"
about it.  The whole reason for a stack is to increase the maximum
voltage that can be rectified. The secondary effect is that more voltage
is dropped.

Of course it would be higher cost, and nobody would design a device with
such a set-up, but in this context.  The context of repairing a device
one can no longer find the original part for...  for that, it would
suffice.
David Lesher - 09 Jul 2009 03:15 GMT
I believe it was the bulb rectifier chargers that had a bad-news side effect.

They were half-wave, directly coupled to the line. If a shop had a large
one, & not much other loads; the pole pig transformer core would start to
saturate with DC.

And when it did... it would fail rather spectacularly.... as in KaBoom...

Signature

A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433

James Sweet - 19 Jun 2009 06:19 GMT
>>>>> Would have been a simple job to put in a normal solid state rectifier,
>>>>> just to keep a historically interesting bit of kit working.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> John G.

You'd probably have to do like the old radio guys do replacing selenium
rectifiers and add a suitable power resistor in series with the diode.
James Sweet - 16 Jun 2009 05:54 GMT
> We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
> drugs began to take hold. I remember "daestrom" <daestrom@twcny.rr.com>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> just to keep a historically interesting bit of kit working.
> Otoh, valve rectifiers are still being made in China, afaik.

I suspect it was something like a Tungar argon rectifier or a mercury
vapor rectifier and not a conventional thermionic diode as is still made
today for tube (valve) audio and such. You need something low impedance
for a battery charger.
Chieftain of the Carpet Crawlers - 16 Jun 2009 06:25 GMT
>> We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
>> drugs began to take hold. I remember "daestrom" <daestrom@twcny.rr.com>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>today for tube (valve) audio and such. You need something low impedance
>for a battery charger.

Probably Mercury Vapor. The thing is likely worth more now dead than it
was new.
daestrom - 16 Jun 2009 21:35 GMT
>> We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
>> drugs began to take hold. I remember "daestrom" <daestrom@twcny.rr.com>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> today for tube (valve) audio and such. You need something low impedance
> for a battery charger.

All I can remember is that it looked remarkably like a large, old-fashioned,
light-bulb.  Had a screw-in 'Edison' bulb base as well.  The only difference
was a single heavy wire also ran to a terminal at the top of the bulb,
opposite the base.  The terminal entered the glass and ended in a simple,
flat plate above the bulb filament.

Remember thinking it was just like I had read in a book on Edison about how
he first discovered the 'Edison effect'.  That a heated filament would give
off electrons to a positively charged plate.

daestrom
John G. - 17 Jun 2009 00:25 GMT
>>> We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
>>> drugs began to take hold. I remember "daestrom" <daestrom@twcny.rr.com>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> daestrom

See this link

http://radioheaven.homestead.com/Tungar.html

John G.
daestrom - 17 Jun 2009 22:44 GMT
> "daestrom" <daestrom@twcny.rr.com> wrote in message
<snip>
>>> I suspect it was something like a Tungar argon rectifier or a mercury
>>> vapor rectifier and not a conventional thermionic diode as is still made
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> http://radioheaven.homestead.com/Tungar.html

While the 'bulb' shown looks familar, the charger in question didn't come in
a box like that.  As I recall it hat a rotary snap switch on the front and a
circular tapped switch to adjust the charging current and one rather
old-fasioned ammeter.  Turned it on and checked the current, adjusting the
tap to suit.

But that definitly looks like the 'bulb' :-)  Thanks for the memory
jogger...

daestrom
JosephKK - 09 Jun 2009 13:03 GMT
>My car battery is oversized for the car.  The battery is a bit old
>but usually works fine.  The battery is flat (I left the lights
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>Is this ok for a car battery or is it way too crude?

It is actually better than you might expect.  It turns out that for
battery and plating type reactions pulsed DC actually works better in
most cases.  It has something to do solution kinetics.  And as other
posters have noted, you gotta monitor that old thing, and about 4
hours max per session, preferably not more than 1 to 2 hours per
session.
Grimly Curmudgeon - 15 Jun 2009 14:14 GMT
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember "JosephKK"<quiettechblue@yahoo.com>
saying something like:

> And as other
>posters have noted, you gotta monitor that old thing, and about 4
>hours max per session, preferably not more than 1 to 2 hours per
>session.

That's a perfectly ordinary home-use 4A charger, of which millions were
made. As charging state rose, the current fell and it took ages for the
battery to start bubbling, usually a day or so.
Still best to have it on a timer, I would agree, but 4 hours per session
is nonsense.
geoff - 15 Jun 2009 19:21 GMT
>We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
>drugs began to take hold. I remember "JosephKK"<quiettechblue@yahoo.com>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>Still best to have it on a timer, I would agree, but 4 hours per session
>is nonsense.

|Septics, eh ?

Signature

geoff

JosephKK - 19 Jun 2009 03:35 GMT
>We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
>drugs began to take hold. I remember "JosephKK"<quiettechblue@yahoo.com>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>Still best to have it on a timer, I would agree, but 4 hours per session
>is nonsense.

By the time the battery is visibly bubbling you have damaged
irreparably.
Dave Platt - 19 Jun 2009 05:17 GMT
>>made. As charging state rose, the current fell and it took ages for the
>>battery to start bubbling, usually a day or so.
>>Still best to have it on a timer, I would agree, but 4 hours per session
>>is nonsense.

>By the time the battery is visibly bubbling you have damaged
>irreparably.

I believe that this depends on the specific battery type.

As I understand it, classic lead-acid flooded storage cells are often
deliberately given a periodic "equalizing charge", at a voltage high
enough to cause electrolysis and bubbling.  This mixes up the
electrolyte, reversing the stratification of water and acid which can
occur in these cells.  One then adds some water to replace what was
lost in gas form due to the electrolysis.  Done properly this doesn't
seem to damage batteries designed for it.

This shouldn't be done to gel cells (or AGM cells, I imagine)... I
believe it *will* damage those.

I'm not sure how tolerant modern "no-maintenance" grid-plate car
batteries are to this sort of overcharge.

Signature

Dave Platt <dplatt@radagast.org>                                   AE6EO
Friends of Jade Warrior home page:  http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior
 I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will
    boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads!

JosephKK - 21 Jun 2009 19:26 GMT
>>>made. As charging state rose, the current fell and it took ages for the
>>>battery to start bubbling, usually a day or so.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>lost in gas form due to the electrolysis.  Done properly this doesn't
>seem to damage batteries designed for it.

That is not the style, action, or purpose of an equalizing charge.  No
bubbling is involved in anything i have found on equalizing charging.

>This shouldn't be done to gel cells (or AGM cells, I imagine)... I
>believe it *will* damage those.
>
>I'm not sure how tolerant modern "no-maintenance" grid-plate car
>batteries are to this sort of overcharge.
Dave Platt - 22 Jun 2009 05:51 GMT
>That is not the style, action, or purpose of an equalizing charge.  No
>bubbling is involved in anything i have found on equalizing charging.

Interesting - thanks.  I've seen articles posted which assert that the
equalizing and de-stratification does involve some amount of
gassing... and now that I look, I see other references which either
don't mention gassing during equalization charge or which state that a
proper equalizing charge should be prolonged, slow, and should
definitely _not_ cause gassing.

Signature

Dave Platt <dplatt@radagast.org>                                   AE6EO
Friends of Jade Warrior home page:  http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior
 I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will
    boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads!

Dave Plowman (News) - 22 Jun 2009 10:35 GMT
> Interesting - thanks.  I've seen articles posted which assert that the
> equalizing and de-stratification does involve some amount of
> gassing... and now that I look, I see other references which either
> don't mention gassing during equalization charge or which state that a
> proper equalizing charge should be prolonged, slow, and should
> definitely _not_ cause gassing.

Every wet battery I've ever seen starts producing the odd gas bubble some
time before its fully charged.

Signature

*If all the world is a stage, where is the audience sitting?

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Chris Whelan - 22 Jun 2009 11:12 GMT
[...]

> Every wet battery I've ever seen starts producing the odd gas bubble
> some time before its fully charged.

Indeed. Used to get lots of bubbles from the fork lift truck batteries
where I worked. So much that the insurers refused to let them be charged
inside the building.

Each battery weighed two tonnes, so I suppose it was to be expected.

Chris

Signature

Remove prejudice to reply.

Dave Plowman (News) - 22 Jun 2009 12:15 GMT
> Indeed. Used to get lots of bubbles from the fork lift truck batteries
> where I worked. So much that the insurers refused to let them be charged
> inside the building.

Yes - explosions in battery charging rooms in garages etc were very common.

Signature

*Some days you're the dog, some days the hydrant.

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

JosephKK - 23 Jun 2009 10:57 GMT
>> Indeed. Used to get lots of bubbles from the fork lift truck batteries
>> where I worked. So much that the insurers refused to let them be charged
>> inside the building.
>
>Yes - explosions in battery charging rooms in garages etc were very common.

OTOH look at the practices, procedures, and policies in Telco battery
rooms.
Roger Hunt - 23 Jun 2009 11:59 GMT
>>> Indeed. Used to get lots of bubbles from the fork lift truck batteries
>>> where I worked. So much that the insurers refused to let them be charged
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>OTOH look at the practices, procedures, and policies in Telco battery
>rooms.

Really? I was in a Tesco battery area the other day and noticed nothing
special.
Signature

Roger Hunt

Redwood - 23 Jun 2009 12:50 GMT
>>>> Indeed. Used to get lots of bubbles from the fork lift truck batteries
>>>> where I worked. So much that the insurers refused to let them be
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Really? I was in a Tesco battery area the other day and noticed nothing
> special.

You missed it, they had a special on AAA's couple weeks ago.
Roger Hunt - 23 Jun 2009 12:54 GMT
>>>>> Indeed. Used to get lots of bubbles from the fork lift truck batteries
>>>>> where I worked. So much that the insurers refused to let them be
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>You missed it, they had a special on AAA's couple weeks ago.

I've never seen a lead/acid AAA battery.
Signature

Roger Hunt

Archimedes' Lever - 24 Jun 2009 01:51 GMT
>>You missed it, they had a special on AAA's couple weeks ago.
>>
>I've never seen a lead/acid AAA battery.

 I do not see where he qualified his remark with a battery type.  Doh!
But you keep right on hunting, Hunt.
Roger Hunt - 24 Jun 2009 09:33 GMT
>>>You missed it, they had a special on AAA's couple weeks ago.
>>>
>>I've never seen a lead/acid AAA battery.
>
>  I do not see where he qualified his remark with a battery type.  Doh!
>But you keep right on hunting, Hunt.

OK, O Wise One, how long should I keep searching for the Holy Cell?
Signature

Roger Hunt

JosephKK - 24 Jun 2009 04:54 GMT
>>>> Indeed. Used to get lots of bubbles from the fork lift truck batteries
>>>> where I worked. So much that the insurers refused to let them be charged
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>Really? I was in a Tesco battery area the other day and noticed nothing
>special.

Isn't Tesco a gas station?
Stuart - 24 Jun 2009 10:27 GMT
> Isn't Tesco a gas station?

They are a major supermarket chain but they do have filling stations at
many of their sites.

I believe some now do have gas (LPG) on the forecourt but most still only
sell petrol and diesel.
daestrom - 23 Jun 2009 01:34 GMT
> [...]
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Each battery weighed two tonnes, so I suppose it was to be expected.

Try charging submarine batteries.  About 128 individual 'cells', each one
weighing over several ton.  Finishing rate was 200 A, the 3-hour discharge
rate was 1750A.  And being on a submarine, you had to recirculate the H2
generated and send it to a 'burner'.

When doing an equalizing charge at the finishing rate, the gas evolved was
almost perfect 2H2 + 1O2 (electrolysis of H2O).  Boat's O2 content would
rise with the H2 content (until the 'burner' could catch up with the
battery).

daestrom
Jules - 23 Jun 2009 16:34 GMT
> Try charging submarine batteries.  About 128 individual 'cells', each one
> weighing over several ton.

Were the cells charged individually, or did they just do several at
once at a fixed rate?

I've wondered before if there's any sense in trying to charge car
battery cells individually, but I suspect it's just not possible
without dedicated terminals for each cell. (sometimes it's useful with
an ailing battery to stick probes down through the cell covers and see
what's going on with individual cells)
daestrom - 23 Jun 2009 22:49 GMT
>> Try charging submarine batteries.  About 128 individual 'cells', each one
>> weighing over several ton.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> an ailing battery to stick probes down through the cell covers and see
> what's going on with individual cells)

All cells connected in series and charged/used that way.  Disconnecting an
individual cell is possible, and sometimes done when a cell goes bad (the
jumpers used to jump across the bad cell are quite large, IIRC six
conductors for + and six for - all about the size of two fingers).

Each cell does have a tiny lead that comes out to a test jack on the
'individual cell voltage panel' where you could measure the voltage of each
cell to spot poor performers.

daestrom
daestrom - 23 Jun 2009 01:30 GMT
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:17:03 -0700, dplatt@radagast.org (Dave Platt)
wrote:

>In article <8aul35ha6ap4v3aomiu9u7epdjlcuftvn4@4ax.com>,
>JosephKK <quiettechblue@yahoo.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>lost in gas form due to the electrolysis.  Done properly this doesn't
>seem to damage batteries designed for it.

That is not the style, action, or purpose of an equalizing charge.  No
bubbling is involved in anything i have found on equalizing charging.

----------

Beg to differ.  Equalizing charge is typically charge at the voltage limit
that will *not* produce gassing until current drops to a low value (often 20
or 30 hour rating).  Then hold current and let voltage rise above the
gassing limit.  Because voltage is above gassing limit, gassing occurs.
Hold current until voltage stops rising for about 1/2 hour and terminate the
charge.

Cheap store-bought chargers will simply have two voltage settings, 'float'
and 'equalizer'.  But 'equalizer' done with this constant-voltage type unit
doesn't do as good a job as the method I described above.

The gassing does promote mixing, but the primary thing is to charge all
cells until voltage stops rising.  Then you can be sure that all sulphates
have been converted back to acid in the electrolyte.  Has to be done at a
low current to avoid excessive heating and water loss.

daestrom
Chieftain of the Carpet Crawlers - 19 Jun 2009 09:47 GMT
>>We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
>>drugs began to take hold. I remember "JosephKK"<quiettechblue@yahoo.com>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>By the time the battery is visibly bubbling you have damaged
>irreparably.

ALL lead acid batteries (not gel cells) bubble while charging.  That is
the normal process.  That is why you keep sparks away from charging
batteries.  It is a normal process.
daestrom - 20 Jun 2009 00:51 GMT
>>We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
>>drugs began to take hold. I remember "JosephKK"<quiettechblue@yahoo.com>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>By the time the battery is visibly bubbling you have damaged
>irreparably.

Where did you get that nonsense?  One of the benefits of equalizer charging
is that it will form bubbles of gas that helps to stir the electrolyte and
mix it to a more uniform concentration.

We deliberately do this to a lot of different lead acid batteries.

What *really* hurts a battery is overheating it or discharging it so low
that you reverse one or more cells.  But charging to the point of gassing is
not a serious problem.

daestrom
(former submarine battery-charging electrician)
Chieftain of the Carpet Crawlers - 20 Jun 2009 01:13 GMT
>>>We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
>>>drugs began to take hold. I remember "JosephKK"<quiettechblue@yahoo.com>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>daestrom
>(former submarine battery-charging electrician)

I used to rock my batteries several times before a charge session.

 Let's have the "placing a lead acid battery on a concrete floor will
discharge it" discussion.

 Maybe we should submit that one to Myth Busters.
phil-news-nospam@ipal.net - 20 Jun 2009 03:10 GMT
In alt.engineering.electrical Chieftain of the Carpet Crawlers <theslipperman@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

| I used to rock my batteries several times before a charge session.
|
|  Let's have the "placing a lead acid battery on a concrete floor will
| discharge it" discussion.
|
|  Maybe we should submit that one to Myth Busters.

I wanna see some batteries explode!  Can they get 1000000 amps through it?

Signature

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Phil Howard KA9WGN       | http://linuxhomepage.com/      http://ham.org/ |
| (first name) at ipal.net | http://phil.ipal.org/   http://ka9wgn.ham.org/ |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chieftain of the Carpet Crawlers - 20 Jun 2009 06:54 GMT
>In alt.engineering.electrical Chieftain of the Carpet Crawlers <theslipperman@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>I wanna see some batteries explode!  Can they get 1000000 amps through it?

Maybe we can get them to go after the world record for size of a Tesla
coil.

 They'd probably have to have a sub-station put in.
Roger Hunt - 21 Jun 2009 17:04 GMT
>In alt.engineering.electrical Chieftain of the Carpet Crawlers <theslipperman@th
>ebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>I wanna see some batteries explode!  Can they get 1000000 amps through it?

I was very close to that once I reckon, with a motorcycle battery, when
I neglected to remove the vent plug before charging.
The whole case was bulging ominously by the time I noticed.
Signature

Roger Hunt

Dave Plowman (News) - 21 Jun 2009 18:38 GMT
> I was very close to that once I reckon, with a motorcycle battery, when
> I neglected to remove the vent plug before charging.
> The whole case was bulging ominously by the time I noticed.

Every low maintenance wet battery I've seen has a vent to stop this
happening. Often with a plastic tube attached to vent the fumes out of
harm's way. Genuine SLA have a vent too - but no 'vent plug'

Signature

*TEAMWORK...means never having to take all the blame yourself *

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Roger Hunt - 21 Jun 2009 18:57 GMT
>> I was very close to that once I reckon, with a motorcycle battery, when
>> I neglected to remove the vent plug before charging.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>happening. Often with a plastic tube attached to vent the fumes out of
>harm's way. Genuine SLA have a vent too - but no 'vent plug'

This was a small (easy to overcharge and froth) basic liquid lead/acid
battery, a Yuasa YB3L, IIRC.
All cells breathe to a vent at the side, then a plastic tube downwards.
When it is supplied wet, this vent is plugged for obvious reasons, and
it is easy to forget to remove it before the initial trickle charge I
used to give them.
Signature

Roger Hunt

dennis@home - 20 Jun 2009 08:38 GMT
> Where did you get that nonsense?  One of the benefits of equalizer
> charging is that it will form bubbles of gas that helps to stir the
> electrolyte and mix it to a more uniform concentration.

I remember my parents always opening the fillers on the top of the battery
to let the gas out.
(why I don't know, they vent when you charge them on the car anyway)

Then they got one of those fancy auto vent batteries with the lift up vent
cover..
they decided that they needed to lift that when charging it.
Came back to a floor covered in battery acid as lifting the strip closed the
vents, really intelligent design that.

So gassing can do a lot of harm if the user expects different behaviour to
what happens.
Chieftain of the Carpet Crawlers - 20 Jun 2009 16:40 GMT
>> Where did you get that nonsense?  One of the benefits of equalizer
>> charging is that it will form bubbles of gas that helps to stir the
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>So gassing can do a lot of harm if the user expects different behaviour to
>what happens.

Gassing doesn't do harm.  Dumb users do harm.  Just like with guns.
JosephKK - 21 Jun 2009 19:30 GMT
>>>We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
>>>drugs began to take hold. I remember "JosephKK"<quiettechblue@yahoo.com>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>daestrom
>(former submarine battery-charging electrician)

The bubbling is mainly released hydrogen.  This results in an unwanted
excess of sulfate ions.  You should be able to figure it out from
there.
daestrom - 23 Jun 2009 01:39 GMT
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:51:55 -0400, "daestrom" <daestrom@twcny.rr.com>
wrote:

>>On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:14:29 +0100, Grimly Curmudgeon
>><grimly4REMOVE@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>daestrom
>(former submarine battery-charging electrician)

The bubbling is mainly released hydrogen.  This results in an unwanted
excess of sulfate ions.  You should be able to figure it out from
there.

Not on the finishing rate of an equalizer.  Then the gas is almost perfect
2H2 + 1O2.  That 'excess sulfate ions' is what you want in order to raise
the concentration of acid in the electrolyte near the beginning of the
charge (that's why s.g. goes up when charging).

Been there, and qualified charging electrician to do that.

daestrom
Grimly Curmudgeon - 21 Jun 2009 00:54 GMT
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember "JosephKK"<quiettechblue@yahoo.com>
saying something like:

>>That's a perfectly ordinary home-use 4A charger, of which millions were
>>made. As charging state rose, the current fell and it took ages for the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>By the time the battery is visibly bubbling you have damaged
>irreparably.

Umm.. lemme see. How many years have I been involved with automotive
batteries? Many.

How many batteries have I wrecked by overcharging them?
None.

How many batteries have I seen bubbling?
Quite a few.

Note that I don't particlarly recommend leaving the battery on a charger
until it's bubbling vigorously, like a deep-fat frier, but if it happens
it happens and so far it's not damaged any flooded lead-acid cells I've
had.
Anyway, that's why I have them on a timer.
James Sweet - 21 Jun 2009 05:11 GMT
> We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
> drugs began to take hold. I remember "JosephKK"<quiettechblue@yahoo.com>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> How many batteries have I seen bubbling?
> Quite a few.

The only time I've ever seen a battery damaged by overcharging was when
the voltage regulator failed on a friend's car in a way that the output
was much higher than it should be, and it boiled almost all the water out.
Too_Many_Tools - 23 Jun 2009 17:59 GMT
> My car battery is oversized for the car.  The battery is a bit old
> but usually works fine.  The battery is flat (I left the lights
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Is this ok for a car battery or is it way too crude?

A related question....

What should the open circuit voltage on a battery charger be?

And when one's charger has its rectifier fail, how should a person
repair the charger?

Thanks

TMT
Dave Plowman (News) - 23 Jun 2009 18:46 GMT
In article
<ae021e4e-811b-4db8-a415-cc2a4d6231d8@j32g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
> A related question....

> What should the open circuit voltage on a battery charger be?

How long is a piece of string? With a crude transformer/rectifier one,
depends on the transformer design. And the type of rectifier. And the
device measuring the voltage. ;-)   What matters is the voltage under load.

> And when one's charger has its rectifier fail, how should a person
> repair the charger?

These days silicon diodes. Suitably heatsinked.

Signature

*Money isn‘t everything, but it sure keeps the kids in touch

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Michael A. Terrell - 23 Jun 2009 21:30 GMT
> In article
> <ae021e4e-811b-4db8-a415-cc2a4d6231d8@j32g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> These days silicon diodes. Suitably heatsinked.

  TMT is a troll who usually hangs around rec.crafts.metalworking

Signature

You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!

Too_Many_Tools - 23 Jun 2009 23:21 GMT
On Jun 23, 3:30 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net>
wrote:

> > In article
> > <ae021e4e-811b-4db8-a415-cc2a4d623...@j32g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> --
> You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!

LOL...TMT is a poster who doesn't take crap from idiots like Michael.

Post any conservative drivel today Michael?

TMT
SoothSayer - 24 Jun 2009 01:56 GMT
>> In article
>> <ae021e4e-811b-4db8-a415-cc2a4d6231d8@j32g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>   TMT is a troll who usually hangs around rec.crafts.metalworking

Terrell is an Alzheimers ridden, senile old dumbfuck that actually
thinks he is informing folks about dangerous things in Usenet.

 Dumbfucks like him are the real danger.  He was probably behind that
bill that was for declaring all opinions about religion as a terrorist
act or other such Terrell like retarded baby bullshit.
Richard Cranium - 24 Jun 2009 04:55 GMT
<<<<<Snip>>>>>

>  Dumbfucks like him are the real danger.  He was probably behind that
>bill that was for declaring all opinions about religion as a terrorist
>act or other such Terrell like retarded baby bullshit.

And speaking about dumbfucks, hey Archie - are you ready to tell us
about the time you claimed you were celibate?  And don't post that
pussy "cite" sillyness.  Just answer the question of whether you said
it, period.
Proteus IIV - 24 Jun 2009 11:54 GMT
On Jun 23, 4:30 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net>
wrote:

> > In article
> > <ae021e4e-811b-4db8-a415-cc2a4d623...@j32g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

AND THAT MAKES YOU THE RESIDENT EXPERT ON TROLLS ????

I AM PROTEUSD
Dave Plowman (News) - 24 Jun 2009 13:21 GMT
In article
<dcde022e-8553-4326-8ffd-18c7ef35f5ff@q14g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>,
> AND THAT MAKES YOU THE RESIDENT EXPERT ON TROLLS ????

> I AM PROTEUSD

Who apparently can't even shout his name correctly.

Signature

*When a clock is hungry it goes back four seconds*

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Jules - 24 Jun 2009 16:10 GMT
> In article
> <dcde022e-8553-4326-8ffd-18c7ef35f5ff@q14g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Who apparently can't even shout his name correctly.

His teletype obviously needs adjusting.
Too_Many_Tools - 23 Jun 2009 23:20 GMT
On Jun 23, 12:46 pm, "Dave Plowman (News)" <d...@davenoise.co.uk>
wrote:
> In article
> <ae021e4e-811b-4db8-a415-cc2a4d623...@j32g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>     Dave Plowman        d...@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
>                   To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Thanks...again...what would a recommended OC voltage be for a battery
charger for lead acid batteries?

TMT
Proteus IIV - 24 Jun 2009 11:53 GMT
On Jun 23, 1:46 pm, "Dave Plowman (News)" <d...@davenoise.co.uk>
wrote:
> In article
> <ae021e4e-811b-4db8-a415-cc2a4d623...@j32g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>     Dave Plowman        d...@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
>                   To e-mail, change noise into sound.

IT SEEMS THE PROBLEM WITH THIS CHARGER IS FILTERING  IN OTHER WORDS
OUTPUT WAVE FORM ATTENUATION
RECTIFYING IS NOT AN ISSUE OR IT WOULD NOT ADJUST TO THE CHARGE AT ALL

I AM PROTEUS
James Sweet - 24 Jun 2009 03:27 GMT
> A related question....
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> TMT

Depends on the charger, but usually a few percent higher than the
voltage rating of the batteries it's meant to charge. It will drop under
load, by how much depends on the design.

When the rectifier fails, you replace the rectifier...
Too_Many_Tools - 24 Jun 2009 03:54 GMT
> > A related question....
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> When the rectifier fails, you replace the rectifier...

Thanks.

The reason why I ask is when I was a kid I repaired a battery charger
that had lost its selenium rectifiers with a couple of diodes. I seem
to remember it being 14 volt something. While I would have thought it
sufficient, the charger seemed to overcharge batteries from then on.

TMT
John G. - 24 Jun 2009 04:07 GMT
On Jun 23, 9:27 pm, James Sweet <jamesswe...@trashmail.net> wrote:
> > A related question....
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> When the rectifier fails, you replace the rectifier...

>Thanks.

>The reason why I ask is when I was a kid I repaired a battery charger
>that had lost its selenium rectifiers with a couple of diodes. I seem
>to remember it being 14 volt something. While I would have thought it
>sufficient, the charger seemed to overcharge batteries from then on.

>TMT

Of course it overcharges and this has already been discussed in this very
thread.

The voltage drop across a modern diode is much less than that across a
selenium rectifier so you have to add some resistance to reduce the current.

John G.
Too_Many_Tools - 24 Jun 2009 17:48 GMT
> On Jun 23, 9:27 pm, James Sweet <jamesswe...@trashmail.net> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> John G.

And adjust the OC voltage to what?

TMT
John G. - 25 Jun 2009 00:16 GMT
On Jun 23, 10:07 pm, "John G." <greent...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
> "Too_Many_Tools" <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> John G.

And adjust the OC voltage to what?

TMT

A resistor will not change the opencircuit voltage it will only change the
current delivered and you will have to decide what is correct for your
transformer and your battery.

If this requires some basic training in electricity well so be it.

John G.
James Sweet - 25 Jun 2009 06:14 GMT
>> On Jun 23, 9:27 pm, James Sweet <jamesswe...@trashmail.net> wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> TMT

You don't adjust the OC voltage, you adjust the *amperage* into a load,
IE, a battery that you wish to charge.
Duncan Wood - 25 Jun 2009 11:02 GMT
>>> On Jun 23, 9:27 pm, James Sweet <jamesswe...@trashmail.net> wrote:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> You don't adjust the OC voltage, you adjust the *amperage* into a load,  
> IE, a battery that you wish to charge.

That depends on the battery & how you're charging it, taper charging a  
lead acid with an upper voltage limit is the normal procedure.
Man at B&Q - 25 Jun 2009 11:02 GMT
> > "Too_Many_Tools" <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> TMT

Why the hang-up over the OC voltage? Read what p[eople are saying.

MBQ
Too_Many_Tools - 26 Jun 2009 05:55 GMT
> > > "Too_Many_Tools" <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> MBQ

I am.

And I really don't understand why no one is able to provide a simple
number of the OC voltage of the charger when it is not hooked up to
the battery.

Simple question...if you measure the OC voltage of a battery charger
meant for lead acid batteries...what is it?

A number please.

Or better yet how about reporting what your various chargers show as
OC DC voltage.

TMT
Dave Plowman (News) - 26 Jun 2009 10:27 GMT
In article
<9acc09bc-a2b9-491e-94ee-4d747988b9bd@q37g2000vbi.googlegroups.com>,
> Simple question...if you measure the OC voltage of a battery charger
> meant for lead acid batteries...what is it?

> A number please.

It depends on so many things that it's impossible to say. For example the
off load voltage of just the transformer varies by the design and quality.
 

> Or better yet how about reporting what your various chargers show as
> OC DC voltage.

Many have a relay on the output operated by the *battery* - with a diode
in the feed to its coil - to prevent wrong connection. So show zero volts
when not connected. Side effect is they can't be used to try and charge a
totally flat battery.

Signature

*A journey of a thousand sites begins with a single click *

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Too_Many_Tools - 27 Jun 2009 06:48 GMT
On Jun 26, 4:27 am, "Dave Plowman (News)" <d...@davenoise.co.uk>
wrote:
> In article
> <9acc09bc-a2b9-491e-94ee-4d747988b...@q37g2000vbi.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>     Dave Plowman        d...@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
>                   To e-mail, change noise into sound.

I understand Dave...and I appreciate your response.

I am attempting to have people measure their battery chargers so I
have a target voltage to shoot for.

I realize that I can look up what different sources will say an OC
voltage is supposed to be but I would like to know what has been done
in practice.

TMT
James Sweet - 27 Jun 2009 09:13 GMT
> I understand Dave...and I appreciate your response.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> TMT

But this won't do anything for you. The output voltage will not be
affected by adding resistance unless the charger is connected to a load.
If there is am amperage rating printed on the face of the charger, you
could hook it up to a load such as a couple of automotive headlamp bulbs
and adjust the resistance such that the output voltage under a 5-10A
load is in the vicinity of 12V, and into a few hundred mA it should be
more like 13.8, this isn't rocket science, and the numbers can be very
approximate, it really doesn't matter.

If precision is important to you, buy a fancy smart charger that you can
"set and forget" and rest easy knowing your batteries will be properly
charged even if you leave the charger connected indefinitely.
Too_Many_Tools - 28 Jun 2009 18:36 GMT
> > I understand Dave...and I appreciate your response.
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> "set and forget" and rest easy knowing your batteries will be properly
> charged even if you leave the charger connected indefinitely.

Thanks for the info...it is appreciated.

TMT
Michael A. Terrell - 26 Jun 2009 12:17 GMT
> > > > "Too_Many_Tools" <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
> number of the OC voltage of the charger when it is not hooked up to
> the battery.

  The only simple thing here is you.  There are too many variables to
give a 'simple' answer.


> Simple question...if you measure the OC voltage of a battery charger
> meant for lead acid batteries...what is it?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Or better yet how about reporting what your various chargers show as
> OC DC voltage.

  Even better, quit trolling.

Signature

You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!

Too_Many_Tools - 27 Jun 2009 05:37 GMT
On Jun 26, 6:17 am, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net>
wrote:

> > > > > "Too_Many_Tools" <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 61 lines]
> --
> You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!

You seem to be the troll here Michael.

TMT
Man at B&Q - 26 Jun 2009 12:21 GMT
> > Why the hang-up over the OC voltage? Read what p[eople are saying.
>
> > MBQ
>
> I am.

Let me rephrase it. Read what people are saying, understand it, and
then you'll see why no one is answering your question.

> And I really don't understand why no one is able to provide a simple
> number of the OC voltage of the charger when it is not hooked up to
> the battery.

There is no one right answer.

> Simple question...if you measure the OC voltage of a battery charger
> meant for lead acid batteries...what is it?

Which charger? Which battery?

> A number please.

42

> Or better yet how about reporting what your various chargers show as
> OC DC voltage.

What knowledge do you hope to gain from that, without knowing the
characteristics of the various chargers? What if one was 25V, another
16V and yet another 0V, what would that tell you? Are any of them
faulty in any way?

MBQ
Rich Grise - 26 Jun 2009 20:58 GMT
>> Why the hang-up over the OC voltage? Read what p[eople are saying.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> number of the OC voltage of the charger when it is not hooked up to
> the battery.

That's because there isn't one. It's generally raw pulsating DC from a
transformer. The battery itself acts as sort of a capacitive filter;
when the xformer's instantaneous voltage exceeds the open-circuit voltage
of the battery, charging current flows. When it drops below the OCV, the
current simply stops flowing and the voltage is whatever the battery is
sitting at at the moment.

About 13.8 is a reasonable voltage for a float charge, and they'll
go up to as much as 14.4 for an "equalize" charge. But usually they're
charged by constant current, so you either need a timer, watch the
clock, or buy an expensive charger that figures out all that stuff
for you.

I wouldn't try to use a battery charger as, say, a general-purpose
high-current power supply without a MONGO LC filter.

Hope This Helps!
Rich
James Sweet - 27 Jun 2009 09:05 GMT
>>>> On Jun 23, 9:27 pm, James Sweet <jamesswe...@trashmail.net> wrote:
>>>>>> A related question....
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> TMT

Because you're asking a question to which there is no standard
quantifiable answer. You are asking something akin to "how long is a
piece of string?" Simply put, the OCV is whatever that particular
charger "wants" to put out with no load, and under load will drop to
wherever the battery "wants" it to be. The OCV is not regulated and will
float to some arbitrary value anywhere from say 5% to 50% greater than
the voltage of the battery it is designed to charge, and this will *not*
be affected by any resistance you place in series. In fact, you cannot
affect the OCV of any voltage source purely by adding resistance unless
you add so much resistance that the voltage is dropped measurably by the
impedance of the meter you use to measure it. This is just how
electricity works, and I'm sorry if you don't understand. Precisely what
the voltage is depends on the design of that particular individual
charger and may even vary some between two chargers of the same model.
It will be affected by line voltage as well. These are simply not
precision devices.

You add resistance in order to adjust the amperage to something
appropriate for the battery, and the OCV does under load will drop to
whatever the battery voltage is.
Proteus IIV - 27 Jun 2009 09:08 GMT
> >>>> On Jun 23, 9:27 pm, James Sweet <jamesswe...@trashmail.net> wrote:
> >>>>>> A related question....
[quoted text clipped - 62 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

DON'T WORRY ABOUT IT I SHALL DEEP PROBE HIM FOR A SOLID AFFIRMITAVE
ANSWER [:-]

I AM PROTEUS
Too_Many_Tools - 28 Jun 2009 18:36 GMT
> >>>> On Jun 23, 9:27 pm, James Sweet <jamesswe...@trashmail.net> wrote:
> >>>>>> A related question....
[quoted text clipped - 60 lines]
> appropriate for the battery, and the OCV does under load will drop to
> whatever the battery voltage is.

I do understand...thanks.

I was asking for an OCV since I considered it a simple request for the
group.

TMT
Ben Bradley - 01 Jul 2009 18:21 GMT
iN
uk.d-i-y,alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.design,uk.rec.cars.maintenance,

>> > And adjust the OC voltage to what?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>Simple question...if you measure the OC voltage of a battery charger
>meant for lead acid batteries...what is it?

  What do you mean? African or European battery charger?

>A number please.
>
>Or better yet how about reporting what your various chargers show as
>OC DC voltage.
>
>TMT
Roger Hunt - 01 Jul 2009 19:07 GMT
>iN
>uk.d-i-y,alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.design,uk.rec.cars.maintenan
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
>   What do you mean? African or European battery charger?

Africa? Careful - South of the Equator the polarity reverses.
Signature

Roger Hunt

Michael A. Terrell - 01 Jul 2009 21:54 GMT
> >iN
> >uk.d-i-y,alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.design,uk.rec.cars.maintenan
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> >
> Africa? Careful - South of the Equator the polarity reverses.

  Then its a good thing that the troll is bipolar.

Signature

You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!

Dave - 25 Jun 2009 00:29 GMT
> On Jun 23, 9:27 pm, James Sweet <jamesswe...@trashmail.net> wrote:
>>> A related question....
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> The voltage drop across a modern diode is much less than that across a
> selenium rectifier so you have to add some resistance to reduce the current.

Wrong, you just have to add a diode or three to create a voltage drop.

Dave
Duncan Wood - 25 Jun 2009 00:34 GMT
>> On Jun 23, 9:27 pm, James Sweet <jamesswe...@trashmail.net> wrote:
>>>> A related question....
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Dave

You just need the right resistor in parallel :-)
Too_Many_Tools - 26 Jun 2009 05:56 GMT
> On Jun 23, 9:27 pm, James Sweet <jamesswe...@trashmail.net> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> John G.

How much resistance?

TMT
Michael A. Terrell - 26 Jun 2009 12:16 GMT
> > On Jun 23, 9:27 pm, James Sweet <jamesswe...@trashmail.net> wrote:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> How much resistance?

  What color is my roof?

Signature

You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!

Rich Grise - 26 Jun 2009 21:02 GMT
>> The voltage drop across a modern diode is much less than that across a
>> selenium rectifier so you have to add some resistance to reduce the current.
>
> How much resistance?

Enough to match the forward drop of the selenium stack under normal
operating conditions.

Hope This Helps!
Rich
James Sweet - 25 Jun 2009 06:12 GMT
>>> A related question....
>>> What should the open circuit voltage on a battery charger be?
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> TMT

Selenium rectifiers have a much higher voltage drop than silicon diodes.
When you replace them with modern diodes, you need a resistor in series
for most applications, the value of which depends on the design load.
Michael A. Terrell - 25 Jun 2009 18:27 GMT
> Selenium rectifiers have a much higher voltage drop than silicon diodes.
> When you replace them with modern diodes, you need a resistor in series
> for most applications, the value of which depends on the design load.

  Or add a buck transformer to the primary to adjust the charging
current, without generating so much waste heat.

Signature

You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!

Proteus IIV - 28 Jun 2009 08:39 GMT
THIS POST IS CRAP

I AM PROTEUS
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.