Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsElectronicsBasicsRepairDesignCADComponentsEquipmentElectrical Engineering
ElectronicsKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Electronics Forum / CAD / July 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

highly-parallel highspeed connection between two FPGA boards

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Maurice Branson - 12 Jul 2007 17:16 GMT
Hello,

designing a motherboard featuring a Virtex-4 FX140 FPGA with 24 integrated
RocketIOs (Gigabit SerDes IOs) I am now facing the problem of how to get the
signals off the board in a most space-saving and elegant way?

All 24 differential signals will be connected to some DACs outside the
motherboard to convert the signals into the analog signal domain.

In the definition of the interface I have nearly all effective degrees of
freedom. I once learned that coaxial connections are the most appropriate
way to do so in terms of signal integrity, but with 24 differential signals
and bidirectional connections that would mean at least 96 SMA connectors
(that takes very large board space and implies some skew problems due to the
differences in the line lengths).

I once used the Tyco ZDOK system (plug + receptacle) for board-to-board
connections with up to 80 parallel signals but unfortunately  the
performance was not satisfactory, so I won't be using them again. Are there
any other interface systems for the above described purpose or ways to build
a highly-parallel highspeed  connection between two boards?

I appreciate every kind of suggestion and help. Thanks a lot in advance.

Regards, Maurice
MM - 12 Jul 2007 18:18 GMT
> designing a motherboard featuring a Virtex-4 FX140 FPGA with 24 integrated
> RocketIOs (Gigabit SerDes IOs) I am now facing the problem of how to get
> the
> signals off the board in a most space-saving and elegant way?

Do you really need all 24 pairs? What is the DACs' sampling rate?

> All 24 differential signals will be connected to some DACs outside the
> motherboard

What does "outside" mean precisely?

/Mikhail
John_H - 12 Jul 2007 18:21 GMT
You're seriously overthinking your problem.  Please indicate the data speeds
you're encountering to help bound the problems in peoples' minds.

Consider the lowly HDMI interface.  These are ~1.8 Gbit/s signals that go
over flimsy, mass-produced cables with flawless digital performance to get
1080p signals.

Twisted pairs will get you to where you need to be.  The speed will dictate
the eye closure over distance and you *probably* are well within the
appropriate operating range.  For the truely demanding applications, twinax
may be necessary but is probably overkill.

If the eye closure is a problem for your chosen transmission media and
distance, preemphasis or receiver compensation can allow your twisted pair
cables to provide an open eye to the A/Ds.  There are several products on
the market that provide the transmit and/or recieve functions to allow
multi-gigabit transmission over very cheap lines.

> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> Regards, Maurice
David L. Jones - 14 Jul 2007 19:52 GMT
> You're seriously overthinking your problem.  Please indicate the data speeds
> you're encountering to help bound the problems in peoples' minds.
>
> Consider the lowly HDMI interface.  These are ~1.8 Gbit/s signals that go
> over flimsy, mass-produced cables with flawless digital performance to get
> 1080p signals.

I'd second HDMI, certainly worth looking at. I just added HDMI to a
Virtex-4 myself.
The Virtex-4 doesn't have the TMDS signaling used on the real HDMI
interface, but you can use LVDS or whatever over the standard
connector.

The Type A connector has 4 pairs, and the Type B has 7 pairs per
connector.

If you are short on space, the HDMI Mini connector has just been
released.

Dave.
dave - 12 Jul 2007 19:46 GMT
In comp.arch Maurice Branson <traubenuss@arcor.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Regards, Maurice

What's the required signaling rate to the DAQs?



Signature

Be Happy. Don't Worry about the difference between lose and loose..

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.