Electronics Forum / CAD / April 2007

was: Fujitsu flash memory programming specification

Your use of Usenet
http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:Gnnj10AfkBUJ:bibleocean.com/OmniDefinition/Us
enet+follow-Usenet-customs-and-*-rules+*-a-service-for-*-*-*-*+hide-the-fact-*-*
-*-they-are-*-on-Usenet+concerns-*-*-*-*-about-the-Google-interface+what.is.wron
g+*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-is-now-legendary+*-*-savvy+Google-cannot-muster-*-*-
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*+*-*-policed&strip=1
needs improvement.
If you feel *compelled* to ask the same question
in MULTIPLE newsgroups, *this* is the prefered technique:
http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:qHhBKJ-sXKYJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-post
+adequately.answered+corrected+with.commas+individually+Disclaimers+deductible+N
ewsgroups-line

Your technique
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?filter=0&enc_author=u_HI4hQAAAAeayk1U1wGL
4GBmmH-l3exOPANdqfI6prRsqjc7uCt1A&scoring=d
is selfish and inefficient.

The last half of this thread explains WHY
and fleshes out the (more acceptable) cross-posting paradigm:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.electronics.basics/browse_frm/thread/7b7c0624
331012bb/3958f18673b5f374?q=EVERY-group-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-appear+*-proper-answer-*
-*-*-given+much-easier-*-*-*-*-*-*-*+*-frowned-on+*-correcting+*-Followup-To-*+*
-*-_perfect_-*-*-*-*+*-*-*-too-lazy-*-*-*-*-*-appropriate-*+*-polite-*-mention-*
-*-*-*-*-*-*+Just-because-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-does-not-mean-*-*-*-*-*-*+mark-*-*-*-*
-all-*-groups+*-*-*-*-two-groups-*-*-aren't-*-different

The last post in that thread hints at why (clueless) Google Groupers
are so reviled by those who read Usenet using a "newsreader".