> You may also find http://www.designers-guide.org/Forum (particularly the circuit
> simulators forum within that) a good place to discuss circuit simulator related
> issues.
Nothing against designers-guide, but I really don't like web forums.
The information that is put on such a forum is very bound to the site
and you have very little possibilibies to access the information
through anything else but the web interface. And what happens if the
owner of the site for some reason won't be able to maintain it?
In my opinion USENET is still, after all these years and all these
"new" technologies, the best way of discussing on-line.

Signature
Svenn
Andrew Beckett - 25 Jan 2006 06:50 GMT
>> You may also find http://www.designers-guide.org/Forum (particularly the circuit
>> simulators forum within that) a good place to discuss circuit simulator related
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>In my opinion USENET is still, after all these years and all these
>"new" technologies, the best way of discussing on-line.
I agree with your point that usenet is the best way of doing this - but since
the proposed group was a web group rather than a usenet group, I thought that it
would be best to use the Designers Guide forum. None of these fora work unless
there is a critical mass of people who read and respond.
The Designer's Guide site has been around for some time now, and is very active.
There was talk of RSS feeds being supported too, which may help those who don't
like web fora! (but that's not there yet...)
Andrew.
Ian Bell - 25 Jan 2006 08:15 GMT
> In my opinion USENET is still, after all these years and all these
> "new" technologies, the best way of discussing on-line.
I disagree. USENET is too prone to scam. A moderated yahoo group with vetted
membership is far better. You can choose to receive emails, a summary email
or scan messages on line.
Ian