Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsElectronicsBasicsRepairDesignCADComponentsEquipmentElectrical Engineering
ElectronicsKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Electronics Forum / CAD / February 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Brain Running Slow This A.M. - Time Delay from Laplace ??

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jim Thompson - 25 Feb 2005 17:52 GMT
My brain is running on slow this A.M.

I can't remember how to calculate time delay versus frequency, given
the Laplace transform.

Please refresh my brain cells.

Thanks!

                                       ...Jim Thompson
|  James E.Thompson, P.E.                           |    mens     |
|  Analog Innovations, Inc.                         |     et      |
|  Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems  |    manus    |
|  Phoenix, Arizona            Voice:(480)460-2350  |             |
|  E-mail Address at Website     Fax:(480)460-2142  |  Brass Rat  |
|       http://www.analog-innovations.com           |    1962     |
           
I love to cook with wine.      Sometimes I even put it in the food.
Rob Gaddi - 25 Feb 2005 18:32 GMT
> I can't remember how to calculate time delay versus frequency, given
> the Laplace transform.

IIRC, L{y(t - d)} = Y(s) * e^(-ds)
Jim Thompson - 25 Feb 2005 18:42 GMT
>> I can't remember how to calculate time delay versus frequency, given
>> the Laplace transform.
>
>IIRC, L{y(t - d)} = Y(s) * e^(-ds)

That's how to INSERT delay.

Given F(s), what's the time delay versus omega?

                                       ...Jim Thompson
|  James E.Thompson, P.E.                           |    mens     |
|  Analog Innovations, Inc.                         |     et      |
|  Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems  |    manus    |
|  Phoenix, Arizona            Voice:(480)460-2350  |             |
|  E-mail Address at Website     Fax:(480)460-2142  |  Brass Rat  |
|       http://www.analog-innovations.com           |    1962     |
           
I love to cook with wine.      Sometimes I even put it in the food.
Larry Brasfield - 25 Feb 2005 19:06 GMT
>>> I can't remember how to calculate time delay versus frequency, given
>>> the Laplace transform.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Given F(s), what's the time delay versus omega?

Given your first post, I would have answered as Mr. Gaddi did.
However, it seems now that you want either group delay or
phase delay.  Since phase delay is pretty obvious, I'm guessing
it's group delay that you want.  Given the Laplace transfer
function, F(s), substitue j*w for s, then take the derivative
of phase with respect to w.  That is group delay.  (Pronounce
'w' as omega.)

Signature

--Larry Brasfield
email: donotspam_larry_brasfield@hotmail.com
Above views may belong only to me.

Jim Thompson - 25 Feb 2005 19:11 GMT
>>>> I can't remember how to calculate time delay versus frequency, given
>>>> the Laplace transform.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>of phase with respect to w.  That is group delay.  (Pronounce
>'w' as omega.)

Thanks!  It's coming back to me.. d(phase)/d(omega)

                                       ...Jim Thompson
|  James E.Thompson, P.E.                           |    mens     |
|  Analog Innovations, Inc.                         |     et      |
|  Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems  |    manus    |
|  Phoenix, Arizona            Voice:(480)460-2350  |             |
|  E-mail Address at Website     Fax:(480)460-2142  |  Brass Rat  |
|       http://www.analog-innovations.com           |    1962     |
           
I love to cook with wine.      Sometimes I even put it in the food.
gwhite - 25 Feb 2005 23:34 GMT
> >>>> I can't remember how to calculate time delay versus frequency, given
> >>>> the Laplace transform.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Thanks!  It's coming back to me.. d(phase)/d(omega)

don't forget the negative sign!:

       -dø
GD =   ----
        dw
Jim Thompson - 25 Feb 2005 23:57 GMT
>> >>>> I can't remember how to calculate time delay versus frequency, given
>> >>>> the Laplace transform.
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> GD =   ----
>         dw

But I build only anticipatory circuits ;-)

                                       ...Jim Thompson
|  James E.Thompson, P.E.                           |    mens     |
|  Analog Innovations, Inc.                         |     et      |
|  Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems  |    manus    |
|  Phoenix, Arizona            Voice:(480)460-2350  |             |
|  E-mail Address at Website     Fax:(480)460-2142  |  Brass Rat  |
|       http://www.analog-innovations.com           |    1962     |
           
I love to cook with wine.      Sometimes I even put it in the food.
Rich Grise - 26 Feb 2005 02:25 GMT
>>> Thanks!  It's coming back to me.. d(phase)/d(omega)
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> But I build only anticipatory circuits ;-)

You mean they finally got that thiotimoline doping process perfected?

;-)
Rich
Mark Fergerson - 27 Feb 2005 08:12 GMT
>>>>Thanks!  It's coming back to me.. d(phase)/d(omega)
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>
>>But I build only anticipatory circuits ;-)

> You mean they finally got that thiotimoline doping process perfected?

  No, but they're _this close_.

  Mark L. Fergerson
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.