Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsElectronicsBasicsRepairDesignCADComponentsEquipmentElectrical Engineering
ElectronicsKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Electronics Forum / Basics / March 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Extech MM560 - Micronta 22-167 Shootout

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Anthony Fremont - 06 Mar 2007 23:53 GMT
Got my new Extech MM560 today, pretty cool.  Haven't had much opportunity to
play with it much yet, but I did a few measurements just to see how the 15
year old Micronta was holding up.

On an old 6V battery I use for tinkering I get this.
Extech: 5.833V
Micronta: 5.98V (2.5% high)

Plugged into the wall:
Extech: 123.61V
Micronta: 124.9V (1% high)

Running PIC Current:
Extech: 1.387mA
Micronta: 1.40mA (<1% high)

Sorry, no resistance or really low current measurements yet.  I do see that
the power company is running the mains at anywhere from 59.9xxHz to 60.0xxHz
though constantly sliding around.  :-)

Concerns:  Build quality seems decent enough.  The probes are certainly
nicer than the Micronta, but we'll have to see how they look after 15 years.
;-)  The meter looks good so far, but it is different from what I'm used to.
When you first set to a uA or mA mode, there is a residual charge of some
sort that counts down for a minute and then settles down to below a count of
8-10 (starts out around 400).  Shorting the probes makes no difference, you
just have to give it a minute to settle down.  Is that normal?

Does anyone else think it odd that the battery was already installed?
Ben Jackson - 07 Mar 2007 07:27 GMT
> When you first set to a uA or mA mode, there is a residual charge of some
> sort that counts down for a minute and then settles down to below a count of
> 8-10 (starts out around 400).  Shorting the probes makes no difference, you
> just have to give it a minute to settle down.  Is that normal?

Thermal converter for the True RMS?  :-)

Signature

Ben Jackson AD7GD
<ben@ben.com>
http://www.ben.com/

Anthony Fremont - 07 Mar 2007 17:18 GMT
>> When you first set to a uA or mA mode, there is a residual charge of
>> some sort that counts down for a minute and then settles down to
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Thermal converter for the True RMS?  :-)

I called Extech about it, they said they didn't think that the meter should
be doing that, especially since shorting the probes makes no difference, but
the fuse is fine.  I'm taking their advice and contacting Mouser about it to
see what they want to do.  After another five or ten minutes, the count
hovers around 4.  It really does act like something is heating up, except
that turning it off and right back on starts the process over.  Strange how
it's completely independant of any measuring you're doing.  I guess it's a
cap/voltage/charge thing affecting some ADC reference chip or something.  I
just emailed Mouser's tech suport arena, we'll see what they say.
Disappointing to say the least.  :-(

If everybody wanted to be really gentelmanly now, they could send me a meter
with an NIST cert. ;-)
Anthony Fremont - 07 Mar 2007 18:39 GMT
> If everybody wanted to be really gentelmanly now, they could send me
> a meter with an NIST cert. ;-)

Everybody, of course meaning Extech and Mouser.  :-)
ehsjr - 08 Mar 2007 03:24 GMT
>>>When you first set to a uA or mA mode, there is a residual charge of
>>>some sort that counts down for a minute and then settles down to
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> If everybody wanted to be really gentelmanly now, they could send me a meter
> with an NIST cert. ;-)

Sorry to hear it - what a PITA.

Maybe they each should end you one of each (w/without the
NIST) so you can compare and see how they should behave. :-)

That's a nice looking meter from the specs - thanks for
posting the url in the other thread. It has a very large
"drool factor". Somehow I couldn't find that on the
spec sheet! :-)

Ed
Anthony Fremont - 08 Mar 2007 03:35 GMT
>>>> When you first set to a uA or mA mode, there is a residual charge
>>>> of some sort that counts down for a minute and then settles down to
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Sorry to hear it - what a PITA.

It'll be a hassle sending it back, but oh well. It still seems to work fine
outside of that little issue.  I'm most surprised that my old meter has held
up as well as it has.

> Maybe they each should end you one of each (w/without the
> NIST) so you can compare and see how they should behave. :-)

I figured they could at least send me a certified one so we could all feel
good knowing it would be right this time?
;-)

> That's a nice looking meter from the specs - thanks for
> posting the url in the other thread. It has a very large
> "drool factor". Somehow I couldn't find that on the
> spec sheet! :-)

It's not quite as flashy as a bright yellow Fluke or a firey red Wavetek,
but it ain't bad.  Decent specs and for the money it seemed the best deal.
MassiveProng - 08 Mar 2007 05:48 GMT
>>>>> When you first set to a uA or mA mode, there is a residual charge
>>>>> of some sort that counts down for a minute and then settles down to
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>It's not quite as flashy as a bright yellow Fluke or a firey red Wavetek,
>but it ain't bad.  Decent specs and for the money it seemed the best deal.

 Should have spent $150 and bought the used HP, which is likely to be
an order of magnitude more accurate, and more reliable, and less
likely to drift over time.

 PERFECT for long term home use without the need for a yearly cal
session!

 Bwuahahahahahahaha!
Anthony Fremont - 08 Mar 2007 09:57 GMT
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:35:05 -0600, "Anthony Fremont"

>> It's not quite as flashy as a bright yellow Fluke or a firey red
>> Wavetek, but it ain't bad.  Decent specs and for the money it seemed
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>  Bwuahahahahahahaha!

How many times do we have to go thru this?  I need/want a portable meter,
not a bench meter.  I need/want .01uA resolution, not 1uA resolution.  Other
than that, I'm sure it's a fine meter.  That's why the 3478a is not the only
thing made.
David L. Jones - 08 Mar 2007 10:00 GMT
On Mar 8, 3:48 pm, MassiveProng
<MassivePr...@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

> >>>>> When you first set to a uA or mA mode, there is a residual charge
> >>>>> of some sort that counts down for a minute and then settles down to
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
>   PERFECT for long term home use without the need for a yearly cal
> session!

You don't get it do you? People buy a hand held meter for many good
reasons, a big bench meter is not an option for them.

Dave :)
MassiveProng - 08 Mar 2007 05:57 GMT
>> When you first set to a uA or mA mode, there is a residual charge of some
>> sort that counts down for a minute and then settles down to below a count of
>> 8-10 (starts out around 400).  Shorting the probes makes no difference, you
>> just have to give it a minute to settle down.  Is that normal?
>
>Thermal converter for the True RMS?  :-)

 He is probably using the 4 to 20 mA scale which is NOT for current
measurement, but for process instrument measurement.

 It RESTS at 4! & EXPECTS 4 as a baseline Minimum!  D'oh!

 Took me all of 6 seconds looking at the data sheet.
Anthony Fremont - 08 Mar 2007 09:52 GMT
>>> When you first set to a uA or mA mode, there is a residual charge
>>> of some sort that counts down for a minute and then settles down to
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>  Took me all of 6 seconds looking at the data sheet.

I know how to take current measurements, and I know how to use a meter in
general.  Reread the post til you understand that the count starts at 400ish
(4.xx mA in mA mode, 4.xx uA in uA mode) and drifts down to around 4 (0.04mA
or 0.04uA) and that shorting the probes has no effect at all.  It has
nothing to do with process measurements or current loops either.  If you'd
have spent another 6 seconds, you would have realized that process current
loop measurements are displayed as percentages, not ordinary mA or uA.

I talked to Extech about it and they think that it's a defective meter.
They said to send it back.
David L. Jones - 08 Mar 2007 12:04 GMT
On Mar 8, 3:57 pm, MassiveProng
<MassivePr...@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

> >> When you first set to a uA or mA mode, there is a residual charge of some
> >> sort that counts down for a minute and then settles down to below a count of
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>   Took me all of 6 seconds looking at the data sheet.

No, it's the True RMS converter.

Dave :)
David L. Jones - 08 Mar 2007 12:13 GMT
On Mar 8, 3:57 pm, MassiveProng
<MassivePr...@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

> >> When you first set to a uA or mA mode, there is a residual charge of some
> >> sort that counts down for a minute and then settles down to below a count of
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>   Took me all of 6 seconds looking at the data sheet.

You don't know your own equipment again! - check your beloved Protek
506, it does a similar thing. Takes almost 30 seconds to settle down
to zero on AC current, but it does get to zero, no apparent offset.

Dave :)
David L. Jones - 08 Mar 2007 09:57 GMT
> Got my new Extech MM560 today, pretty cool.  Haven't had much opportunity to
> play with it much yet, but I did a few measurements just to see how the 15
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> 8-10 (starts out around 400).  Shorting the probes makes no difference, you
> just have to give it a minute to settle down.  Is that normal?

DC or AC range?

The lower DC ranges on higher spec meters often have Gohm input
impedance which pick up noise, but goes away instantly when you short
the probe.

Dave :)
Anthony Fremont - 08 Mar 2007 10:20 GMT
>> Got my new Extech MM560 today, pretty cool.  Haven't had much
>> opportunity to play with it much yet, but I did a few measurements
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> impedance which pick up noise, but goes away instantly when you short
> the probe.

Shorting the probes has no effect.  :-(  Oddly enough, it only does then
when you have AC+DC (which was apparently the default) or just AC selected.
If you select DC only then it seems fine.  OTOH, if you select only AC
current, it does the countdown thing, only slightly differently (it takes
the same amount of time to get down near zero, it just updates the display
several times/second instead of once every couple of seconds).  Strange.  I
wish someone else had one and could tell me there experience.
David L. Jones - 08 Mar 2007 11:58 GMT
> >> Got my new Extech MM560 today, pretty cool.  Haven't had much
> >> opportunity to play with it much yet, but I did a few measurements
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> several times/second instead of once every couple of seconds).  Strange.  I
> wish someone else had one and could tell me there experience.

Sorry, thought you were talking about the voltage range :-/

My Fluke 87III does the same thing on the uA and mA AC current range.

In the 4.5 digit uA mode it starts out out around 2.8uA and slowly
settles down over about 30 seconds to around 0.18uA and won't go
lower.
In 3.5 digit mode it starts around 3.5uA and drops to around the same
0.1-0.2uA, but it's faster than the 4.5 digit mode.
mA range is similar with a residual offset of around 1.8mA

Obviously the True RMS converter has some settling time, and a
residual offset which you can null out, but it takes time again to
settle down to zero after the null.

DC is of course fine as there is no True RMS converter to deal with.

I don't think there is anything wrong with your meter, it's fairly
normal for True RMS meters.

Meters without True RMS don't exhibit this problem, they just go to
zero straight away and sit there.

Dave :)
Anthony Fremont - 08 Mar 2007 12:38 GMT
>>>> Got my new Extech MM560 today, pretty cool.  Haven't had much
>>>> opportunity to play with it much yet, but I did a few measurements
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>
> My Fluke 87III does the same thing on the uA and mA AC current range.

Hmm......

> In the 4.5 digit uA mode it starts out out around 2.8uA and slowly
> settles down over about 30 seconds to around 0.18uA and won't go
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> residual offset which you can null out, but it takes time again to
> settle down to zero after the null.

I wonder why the tech support guy didn't snap to that?  I guess he probably
figured I had it in straight DC mode.

> DC is of course fine as there is no True RMS converter to deal with.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Meters without True RMS don't exhibit this problem, they just go to
> zero straight away and sit there.

Ok then, I may keep it for a while and see how it does.  It certainly seems
accurate.  It has a 3yr warranty, and it certainly seems like Extech is
willing to stand behind their product.  I just did some tests and sure
enough in DCV mode if I press SELECT and chose RMS, it does the same kind of
thing.  It takes almost two minutes to really settle out.  I don't think I
like that, but it sounds like it is par for the course.  Really updates the
display slowly doing RMS measurements too (like once every two seconds).

I just did a couple of resistance measurements:

1M resistor
Extech: 1.0195M
Micronta 1.020M (.05% high)

390R
Extech: 394.44R
Micronta: .395K  (.14% high)

I don't know, but I think my Micronta is not too shabby.
David L. Jones - 08 Mar 2007 21:02 GMT
> >>>> Got my new Extech MM560 today, pretty cool.  Haven't had much
> >>>> opportunity to play with it much yet, but I did a few measurements
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
> I wonder why the tech support guy didn't snap to that?  I guess he probably
> figured I had it in straight DC mode.

Yeah, or they might simply follow the "customer is always right"
policy, and just wanted to keep you happy.

> > DC is of course fine as there is no True RMS converter to deal with.
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> like that, but it sounds like it is par for the course.  Really updates the
> display slowly doing RMS measurements too (like once every two seconds).

I'm not really a huge fan of True RMS meters, they are slow and
generally not as accurate as normal meters. If you *know* you have a
sinusoidal signal then a normal meter is better.
Switchable true RMS would be nice!

> I just did a couple of resistance measurements:
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> I don't know, but I think my Micronta is not too shabby.

It's not, it's a perfectly fine meter for general use.

Dave :)
Anthony Fremont - 08 Mar 2007 22:43 GMT
>> I wonder why the tech support guy didn't snap to that?  I guess he
>> probably figured I had it in straight DC mode.
>
> Yeah, or they might simply follow the "customer is always right"
> policy, and just wanted to keep you happy.

They certainly didn't make me unhappy by that.  Now Mouser on the other
hand........... e-mail to tech support at 11:00am yesterday, not a peep.  I
guess they aren't much on e-mail.  I'm going to go ahead and keep it for
now, at least until I have reason to suspect that something really is wrong
with it.

>>> DC is of course fine as there is no True RMS converter to deal with.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> sinusoidal signal then a normal meter is better.
> Switchable true RMS would be nice!

Sure does give really slow updates (seconds between each one).  I'm glad I
don't have to use it unless I need it.

>> I just did a couple of resistance measurements:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> It's not, it's a perfectly fine meter for general use.

I looked around some of the cal sites and in some places it's one of the
very few radio shack models they will even look at.  This seems to be an
almost exact copy of it:
http://www.tequipment.net/EZDigitalKD3220.asp.  The pc board has KD-3200C
stamped on it.  Awful cheap now compared to when I bought mine.

I sure wish my scope would hurry up and get here.  :-)
David L. Jones - 08 Mar 2007 23:57 GMT
> >> I wonder why the tech support guy didn't snap to that?  I guess he
> >> probably figured I had it in straight DC mode.
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
> almost exact copy of it:http://www.tequipment.net/EZDigitalKD3220.asp.  The pc board has KD-3200C
> stamped on it.  Awful cheap now compared to when I bought mine.

I like that it uses the same jack for V/ohms and uA/mA, no lead
swapping.

What's the build quality of the Extech like inside?
Photos?

> I sure wish my scope would hurry up and get here.  :-)

Was that the 1000 series Rigol ?

Dave :)
Anthony Fremont - 09 Mar 2007 00:45 GMT
>> I looked around some of the cal sites and in some places it's one of
>> the
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I like that it uses the same jack for V/ohms and uA/mA, no lead
> swapping.

Right, just fuses.  ;-)

> What's the build quality of the Extech like inside?
> Photos?

I haven't opened it up yet, since it had the batter installed already.  I'll
try to do it before the weekend is out.  Exterior is good, the backlight is
pretty bad.  Not sure what they were thinking on that, maybe it's a power
consumption thing.  Instead of being edge lit, it seems to have four leds
behind the panel.  Maybe it's an illusion.

>> I sure wish my scope would hurry up and get here.  :-)
>
> Was that the 1000 series Rigol ?

Yup, that would be it.  The DS-1102C.  I passed on the logic analyzer
function, but it seemed to be a decent one.  I'm going to wait for an
external LA that decodes protocols.  What do you think of this for a beater?
Nice big 8" screen with full VGA 640x480:
http://www.saelig.com/miva/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Product_Code=PSSA002&Categor
y_Code
=
It seriously looks like allot of these scopes share allot of the same
hardware technology internally, regardless of the name.  Even the software
looks and functions in suspiciously similar ways between brands.  These
scopes are made by Owon: http://www.owon.com.cn/eng/index.asp  Too much
engrish in the manual though, and ugly overcompressed diagrams and images.
Too bad, cuz with a full VGA display, it'd pretty much have to look nice and
sharp.  They shouldn't have chinced like that on their manual.  The battery
option is only like $75US.
Robert Baer - 09 Mar 2007 00:14 GMT
>>>I wonder why the tech support guy didn't snap to that?  I guess he
>>>probably figured I had it in straight DC mode.
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
>
> I sure wish my scope would hurry up and get here.  :-)

  Mouser has an 800 number and they have always been courteous and helpful.
  And it did not seem to make a difference whether i wanted to return
*one* item or order 70,000.
Anthony Fremont - 09 Mar 2007 00:46 GMT
>   Mouser has an 800 number and they have always been courteous and
>   helpful. And it did not seem to make a difference whether i wanted
> to return *one* item or order 70,000.

I'm sure that's true, I've bought stuff from them for over ten years.  I'll
let them slide this time on it. ;-)
MassiveProng - 08 Mar 2007 23:58 GMT
>>> Got my new Extech MM560 today, pretty cool.  Haven't had much
>>> opportunity to play with it much yet, but I did a few measurements
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>several times/second instead of once every couple of seconds).  Strange.  I
>wish someone else had one and could tell me there experience.

 On a uA scale on AC, it could easily be induced into it from local
sources.

 See if it does it without the leads attached.  If not, try it with
the leads twisted.

Maybe you have a little electric eel in you.
David L. Jones - 09 Mar 2007 00:05 GMT
On Mar 9, 9:58 am, MassiveProng
<MassivePr...@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

> >>> Got my new Extech MM560 today, pretty cool.  Haven't had much
> >>> opportunity to play with it much yet, but I did a few measurements
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
>
>  Maybe you have a little electric eel in you.

Then you must have one too.
Your beloved Protec 506 does a similar thing without the leads, uA and
mA scale.
It's the RMS converter settling.

Dave :)
MassiveProng - 09 Mar 2007 01:09 GMT
>On Mar 9, 9:58 am, MassiveProng
><MassivePr...@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
>mA scale.
>It's the RMS converter settling.

Some meters beep alarm when in current mode without leads.
Anthony Fremont - 09 Mar 2007 02:17 GMT
> On 8 Mar 2007 16:05:55 -0800, "David L. Jones" <altzone@gmail.com>

>> Then you must have one too.
>> Your beloved Protec 506 does a similar thing without the leads, uA
>> and mA scale.
>> It's the RMS converter settling.
>
> Some meters beep alarm when in current mode without leads.

This one gets all upset if you have the red lead in a current measurement
hole, but turn the dial to voltage or resistance settings.  It doesn't seem
to care about the other way.  I guess it's protected and it figures that the
user will figure out why they aren't getting a reading.
Anthony Fremont - 09 Mar 2007 01:04 GMT
> On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 04:20:31 -0600, "Anthony Fremont"

>> Shorting the probes has no effect.  :-(  Oddly enough, it only does
>> then when you have AC+DC (which was apparently the default) or just
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>  See if it does it without the leads attached.  If not, try it with
> the leads twisted.

It does it with no leads.  Any time it is first placed in one of the AC or
RMS modes, it does this.  What seems so strange is that switching from mA to
uA doesn't change what you see in the display, it just keeps doing it's
thang counting downwards.  The general consensus is that the true RMS
converter is to blame here and that this is normal behavior.  David says his
Fluke takes about 30 seconds to settle down.  This one will keep going for
about two minutes before it really gets "stable", but after the first 30
seconds or so it's within about 20 counts of its resting point.  The meter
seems to work fine, at least it's in agreement with my micronta.  ;-)

> Maybe you have a little electric eel in you.
MassiveProng - 09 Mar 2007 01:22 GMT
>It does it with no leads.  Any time it is first placed in one of the AC or
>RMS modes, it does this.

Another poster's claim about the RMS circuitry seems true then.  I
don't think it is a heating then as he said though.  It is simply a
settling resolve at that delicate scale.  Evidenced also by the fact
that it repeats even with great immediacy of a power/setting cycle.

Greater scales likely do it as well, only in mere milliseconds.
MassiveProng - 09 Mar 2007 01:24 GMT
> What seems so strange is that switching from mA to
>uA doesn't change what you see in the display, it just keeps doing it's
>thang counting downwards.  The general consensus is that the true RMS
>converter is to blame here and that this is normal behavior.  David says his
>Fluke takes about 30 seconds to settle down.

Does it do so WHILE actually attempting to take a reading?  As in, if
you look at some known current level right after a switch to that
scale...

It will either float down, or read the known value.  It might just
not like resolving the RMS value for ZERO.  :-]
Anthony Fremont - 09 Mar 2007 02:23 GMT
>> What seems so strange is that switching from mA to
>> uA doesn't change what you see in the display, it just keeps doing
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> you look at some known current level right after a switch to that
> scale...

At least when the current that you measure is larger than the count, it
doesn't seem to be affecting anything.  IOW, you won't see 1.50mA ticking
downward continuously.

> It will either float down, or read the known value.  It might just
> not like resolving the RMS value for ZERO.  :-]

It seems to act like it's following a charge or discharge curve.  It counts
way fast at first and then keeps slowing down.  I never really need RMS
values anyhow, so I can just turn it off.  What does your Protek do when you
first put it in an RMS mode?  Does it need a little settling time?
David L. Jones - 09 Mar 2007 03:44 GMT
> >> What seems so strange is that switching from mA to
> >> uA doesn't change what you see in the display, it just keeps doing
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> values anyhow, so I can just turn it off.  What does your Protek do when you
> first put it in an RMS mode?  Does it need a little settling time?

As I mentioned in another post, the Protek 506 does the same thing,
takes about 30 seconds to settle down to zero, it does not have an
offset though.

Your Extech has switchable True RMS mode? If so that would be the
first meter I've seen with such a nice function!

Dave :)
MassiveProng - 09 Mar 2007 04:57 GMT
>As I mentioned in another post, the Protek 506 does the same thing,
>takes about 30 seconds to settle down to zero, it does not have an
>offset though.
>
>Your Extech has switchable True RMS mode? If so that would be the
>first meter I've seen with such a nice function!

Yeah, he threw me with that one as mine is in that mode all the time.
Suck a.s meter though, by any desirable spec seekers.
Anthony Fremont - 09 Mar 2007 09:59 GMT
>> It seems to act like it's following a charge or discharge curve.  It
>> counts way fast at first and then keeps slowing down.  I never
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Dave :)
Anthony Fremont - 09 Mar 2007 10:05 GMT
> Your Extech has switchable True RMS mode? If so that would be the
> first meter I've seen with such a nice function!

You can pick DC, AC or Both (I assume that's "both" is true RMS mode).  When
in "both" mode, the display updates very slowly.  The countdown effect
occurs even when using just plain old AC mode (current or voltage), but the
display updates several times/second instead.  The "countdown" procedes at
it's own pace no matter what mode you choose.  This only happens in AC or
"both" modes, not in any strictly DC mode.
David L. Jones - 09 Mar 2007 11:59 GMT
> > Your Extech has switchable True RMS mode? If so that would be the
> > first meter I've seen with such a nice function!
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> it's own pace no matter what mode you choose.  This only happens in AC or
> "both" modes, not in any strictly DC mode.

In that case then it's always True RMS just like every other meter. Oh
well.

I presume it's slower in dual display mode because it has to use the
same converter to alternate between direct DC measurement, and
measurement of the output from the true RMS converter.

Dave :)
MassiveProng - 09 Mar 2007 03:46 GMT
>It seems to act like it's following a charge or discharge curve.  It counts
>way fast at first and then keeps slowing down.  I never really need RMS
>values anyhow, so I can just turn it off.  What does your Protek do when you
>first put it in an RMS mode?  Does it need a little settling time?

 I think it is pretty cheap.  Nowhere near as good or advanced as the
ex you have.  This meter is like six years old.  It is also very
basic.  I said I only use it for easy stuff like automotive.

Just looked...  It's pretty sad only 4000 count... yes, only 3 zeros!

I'm sure that its version of "RMS" is a "close approximation", not
anything worth relying on too heavily.

 It says "True RMS", but back in the seventies, car stereo makers
made a lot of false claims too. :-]  Bet it would fail on 15th order
harmonics.

On current, it says it has a 400uA range with 0.1uA resolution.

 The thing I like is the data link capacity. For a cheap meter, I can
pump figures into a spreadsheet without doing double entry.

 Still some pretty sad figures by today's standards.

 My OLD HP still hits home runs with some of the best of them though.
Anthony Fremont - 09 Mar 2007 10:16 GMT
>> It seems to act like it's following a charge or discharge curve.  It
>> counts way fast at first and then keeps slowing down.  I never
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Just looked...  It's pretty sad only 4000 count... yes, only 3 zeros!

My micronta is only 3200 counts.  Was great back then.

> I'm sure that its version of "RMS" is a "close approximation", not
> anything worth relying on too heavily.
>
>  It says "True RMS", but back in the seventies, car stereo makers
> made a lot of false claims too. :-]  Bet it would fail on 15th order
> harmonics.

And they stopped.....when??

> On current, it says it has a 400uA range with 0.1uA resolution.

So far I'm really happy with the low current measurement ability.  My
micronta would give me .1uA resolution, but it wouldn't lock onto anything
that was less than about 1uA.  For example, at 600nA, the Micronta would
kinda shudder and occasaionally show a reading of .6 or .7, but most of the
time it would show -0 or some such.  The Extech has no problems.  :-)

>  The thing I like is the data link capacity. For a cheap meter, I can
> pump figures into a spreadsheet without doing double entry.

Yeah, the extech has a data output, but it costs $70 for the cable and
software.  It's a purely optical connection so I guess that's good from a
safety standpoint.  I'm going to try and see if I can decode the data coming
out the IR LED in the back......if my scope ever gets here.

>  Still some pretty sad figures by today's standards.
>
>  My OLD HP still hits home runs with some of the best of them though.

The HP has really nice specs and ebay has them at a reasonable price.
Tucker wants 750 for a refurb, can you believe that?
www.china-powerseller.com - 09 Mar 2007 14:45 GMT
Dear friend :
It is my fortunate writing to you . you will discover this is a wealth
accumulation place.
The website of our company is http://www.china-powerseller.com
We are a big agent for Laptop
Mobile Phone\Digital Camera\CDJ\DJM\Apple Ipod\PSP\VEDEO GAMES
\Television\GPS\Telescope in CHINA .
All of our commodities is the most advanced quality but lowest price.
we also have the

safest and most
convenient transaction way to guarante the transaction arries on
normally .
looking forward to your coorporation and cause all of us both to
profit.
you can contact us by Email:china.seller#hotmail.com
MSN: china.seller#hotmail.com
best wishes!
your sincerely

http://www.china-powerseller.com
MSN/Email: china.seller@hotmail.com
DaveC - 09 Mar 2007 19:35 GMT
www.china-powerseller.com sez:

> Dear friend :
> It is my fortunate writing to you . you will discover this is a wealth
> accumulation place.

Is this just a 'bot'?
Signature

DaveC
me@bogusdomain.net
This is an invalid return address
Please reply in the news group

Anthony Fremont - 09 Mar 2007 20:41 GMT
> www.china-powerseller.com sez:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Is this just a 'bot'?

Probably.  Looks like maybe it is tagging onto threads with more than a
certain number of posts.  There's probably a method to the madness in there
somewhere.

You never did say what you thought of the Owon 25MHz-100Msa/s-6K buffer DSO
on sale for $329.
http://www.saelig.com/miva/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Product_Code=PSSA002&Categor
y_Code
=
DaveC - 16 Mar 2007 05:54 GMT
> You never did say what you thought of the Owon 25MHz-100Msa/s-6K buffer DSO
> on sale for $329.

Well, I don't know if I'm qualified. I've not had a lot of experience
evaluating scopes. I just usually buy quality used brand names (I own 2
Tektronix scopes). But if I had to buy new and wanted an LCD scope, I might
try it.

Looking at the specs, I notice it says "Sampling rate: 100 MS/s" then a bit
later "Sampling rate range "10 S/s ~ 250 MS/s". Don't know what that means
(if it's a range, why say 100MS/s? If its set, why say 10 S/s ~ 250 MS/s?) I
would have to ask questions about it.

But most of all, I think equipment like this is best tried out. If you know
someone who already has a certain model, you can "test drive" it. Or if the
seller is willing to offer a decent return policy, that would be another way
I'd be tempted.

But outright buying it from what I see on the web site? Mmm... I think I'd
not do that. But then I'm not looking right now.

Hope that's somewhat helpful.

Enjoy,
Signature

DaveC
me@bogusdomain.net
This is an invalid return address
Please reply in the news group

Anthony Fremont - 16 Mar 2007 13:27 GMT
>> You never did say what you thought of the Owon 25MHz-100Msa/s-6K
>> buffer DSO on sale for $329.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> 2 Tektronix scopes). But if I had to buy new and wanted an LCD scope,
> I might try it.

I just meant in terms of the pricing.  $329 for a color DSO seems an awful
good deal.  Nice big full VGA screen too.

> Looking at the specs, I notice it says "Sampling rate: 100 MS/s" then
> a bit later "Sampling rate range "10 S/s ~ 250 MS/s". Don't know what
> that means (if it's a range, why say 100MS/s? If its set, why say 10
> S/s ~ 250 MS/s?) I would have to ask questions about it.

Hmmm.....I hadn't noticed that.  The Rigol changes the sample rate based
upon the time base selected and the buffer length (norm 1k/2k or deep
512k/1M).  I'm surprised at how useful a seemingly small 2k buffer is.

> But most of all, I think equipment like this is best tried out. If
> you know someone who already has a certain model, you can "test
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Hope that's somewhat helpful.

I was just curious what you thought of the price.
DaveC - 16 Mar 2007 18:15 GMT
> I was just curious what you thought of the price.

Less is better! (c:  But I have to evaluate the product too. I mean, if it's
a pile of rubble, $2 is too much. If it's the functional equivalent of the
Tektronix 2465 and more, then $329 is a fabulous price. You get what I
mean...
Signature

DaveC
me@bogusdomain.net
This is an invalid return address
Please reply in the news group

KTy - 30 Mar 2007 10:46 GMT
> > I was just curious what you thought of the price.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> This is an invalid return address
> Please reply in the news group

Any feedback from the OWON ?
Anthony Fremont - 30 Mar 2007 13:02 GMT
>>> I was just curious what you thought of the price.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Any feedback from the OWON ?

None yet that I've seen.  I have the Rigol DS1102C and I'm really happy so
far.  I'm really impressed with Rigol tech support.  I had a couple of
questions/issues and they were very responsive via e-mail.  Not bad for
dealing straight with China IMO.  :-)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.