> > Would a multi turn coil, a metre or two in diameter, buried beneath the
> > surfce of a driveway, with the ends of the coil connected to the input pins
> > of a operational amplifier serve as a reliable vehicle detector?
>
> I seriously doubt it, if the opamp is connected as a simple gain block.
I was thinking that the vehicle would be magnetic enough to induce a current
in the coil and that the op-amp would amplify the voltage difference between
the two inputs.
R
> Most vehicle detectors based on coils operate on the principle of
> exciting the coil with some frequency around 10kHz to 100kHz, (higher
> frequency for a single or double turn, lower frequency for higher
> number of turns) and react to either the change in inductance or
> change in loss of the coil when a vehicle gets inside the AC magnetic
> field. This takes a bit more than a gain block.
This seems to be much like a metal detector.
R
Rich Grise - 27 Sep 2006 23:29 GMT
> This seems to be much like a metal detector.
Exactly. :-)
Cheers!
Rich
>> Would a multi turn coil, a metre or two in diameter, buried beneath the
>> surfce of a driveway, with the ends of the coil connected to the input
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> of the coil when a vehicle gets inside the AC magnetic field. This
> takes a bit more than a gain block.
Ah!! you never heard about a moving magnet(the car)
over a coil??
A bit of amplifier and a Schmitt trigger plus a oneshot
for a dead time window ought to show interesting
things.
Things might improve,if 1 or two amps dc flowed in the
coil,that way the car needs no remanent field of its own.
Of course there are about @#$% other ways of doing it,
but dont underestimate rogers idea.
petrus bitbyter - 13 Sep 2006 00:42 GMT
>>> Would a multi turn coil, a metre or two in diameter, buried beneath the
>>> surfce of a driveway, with the ends of the coil connected to the input
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Of course there are about @#$% other ways of doing it,
> but dont underestimate rogers idea.
Hmm... The idea is not very new. Magnetic mines used the magnetic field (or
better disruption of the earthmagnetic field) caused by a ship. But a ship
is a very big thing compared to a car. Ships (iron ships) were often more or
less magnetic which could be decreased by degausing. Navy vessels still have
a degausing system installed. Most cars are lousy magnets. To induce
something measurable the car has to pass the coil with pretty high speed. I
guess you will not drive that fast in a driveway. (Which I suppose to be the
place it is meant to be used.) Pushing a DC-current through the coil will
not do any good. It's only wasting energy.
petrus bitbyter
Roger Dewhurst - 13 Sep 2006 02:03 GMT
> >>> Would a multi turn coil, a metre or two in diameter, buried beneath the
> >>> surfce of a driveway, with the ends of the coil connected to the input
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> place it is meant to be used.) Pushing a DC-current through the coil will
> not do any good. It's only wasting energy.
I suppose if one makes the loop part of a frequency generator any change in
the inductance caused by the vehicle will change the frequency in the loop.
But that is a bit more fiddly.
R
> petrus bitbyter
jasen - 14 Sep 2006 10:59 GMT
>>> Would a multi turn coil, a metre or two in diameter, buried beneath the
>>> surfce of a driveway, with the ends of the coil connected to the input
>>> pins
>>> of a operational amplifier serve as a reliable vehicle detector?
>>
>> I seriously doubt it, if the opamp is connected as a simple gain block.
> Ah!! you never heard about a moving magnet(the car)
> over a coil??
that'd detect the motion of the car, but not its presence,
the active loop ("metal-detector") way triggers on the presence of a vehicle
and is more sensitive. (a loop of steel packing strap or a bicycle wheel is
enough to trigger many)
> A bit of amplifier and a Schmitt trigger plus a oneshot
> for a dead time window ought to show interesting
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Of course there are about @#$% other ways of doing it,
> but dont underestimate rogers idea.
you could sneak up on it and it'd not trigger.
Bye.
Jasen
Roger Dewhurst - 14 Sep 2006 22:32 GMT
> >>> Would a multi turn coil, a metre or two in diameter, buried beneath the
> >>> surfce of a driveway, with the ends of the coil connected to the input
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> that'd detect the motion of the car, but not its presence,
It is only movement over the coil, onto it or off it, which are of interest.
R