Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsElectronicsBasicsRepairDesignCADComponentsEquipmentElectrical Engineering
ElectronicsKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Electronics Forum / Basics / July 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

12V 80Va Transformer

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ian Tedridge - 28 Jul 2006 17:32 GMT
Help Please,

Can somebody explain to me what 80VA Means for a transformer with 2 x 12V
outputs, and 240V inputs.

What I am interested in is the max amps I can pull per 12v output.

If I connect the 2 off 12v outputs in parallel, does this mean I can pull
double the current ?

Cheers
petrus bitbyter - 28 Jul 2006 17:55 GMT
> Help Please,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Cheers

You can get 80/24=3.3A out of it when 12V outputs in series or 6,6A when in
parallel. This applies for a constant load, regardless of the phase angle.
When using rectifiers you have to use a correction factor.

petrus bitbyter
tapwater@roomtemperature.deg - 29 Jul 2006 02:42 GMT
So why would anyone use the outputs in series?

> > Help Please,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> petrus bitbyter
Tom Biasi - 29 Jul 2006 02:53 GMT
> So why would anyone use the outputs in series?

To get the desired voltage.
Sjouke Burry - 29 Jul 2006 02:58 GMT
> So why would anyone use the outputs in series?
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>>
>>petrus bitbyter

To get 24 volts???
Eeyore - 29 Jul 2006 03:05 GMT
> So why would anyone use the outputs in series?

Why would anyone answer such a stupid question ?

Graham
tapwater@roomtemperature.deg - 29 Jul 2006 04:16 GMT
Because this is the place for stupid questions, and petrus bitbyter didn't
mention the 24 volts in his original reply. He, however seems legitimately
interested in using this place to discuss electrical questions, and not as a
place to get frustrated.

> > So why would anyone use the outputs in series?
>
> Why would anyone answer such a stupid question ?
>
> Graham
Phil Allison - 29 Jul 2006 04:28 GMT
<tapwater@roomtemperature.deg>  =  a very tepid drip

> Because this is the place for stupid questions,

**  Not from  FUCKWITS  or  TROLLS   like you  -  a.shole

> and petrus bitbyter didn't mention the 24 volts in his original reply.

**  I see you  HAVE  already wanked yourself  BLIND  -  FUCKWIT

   Takes time to get used to using Braille.

    LOL

.......  Phil

>> > So why would anyone use the outputs in series?
>>
>> Why would anyone answer such a stupid question ?
>>
>> Graham
Eeyore - 29 Jul 2006 06:25 GMT
> Because this is the place for stupid questions, and petrus bitbyter didn't
> mention the 24 volts in his original reply.

He did actually ( in an equation ) ,  but it went right over your dumb head.

Graham
John Fields - 29 Jul 2006 15:55 GMT
>Because this is the place for stupid questions

---
No, this is supposed to be the place where there _are_ no stupid
questions.

Stupid _posters_, however, are another matter, and you seem to be
leading that pack by leaps and bounds.

Learn to bottom post, dumbass.

Signature

John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

Sandbox Moderator - 31 Jul 2006 21:01 GMT
>> So why would anyone use the outputs in series?
>
> Why would anyone answer such a stupid question ?
>
> Graham

Be nice. This is .basics. We don't call newbies "stupid" here, we
help them to understand.

Ignorance is the first stage of Wisdom.

Thanks,
Rich
John Fields - 31 Jul 2006 21:32 GMT
>>> So why would anyone use the outputs in series?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Be nice. This is .basics. We don't call newbies "stupid" here, we
>help them to understand.

---
And, if they're stupid, they need to be helped to understand that as
well.
---

>Ignorance is the first stage of Wisdom.

---
No, it isn't.  Recognizing one's own ignorance is.

Signature

John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

John Fields - 29 Jul 2006 15:45 GMT
>So why would anyone use the outputs in series?

---
Aren't you that same stupid, top-posting sonofabitch who made a
complete a.s out of himself in that "downed powerline" thread?

Geez, it seems like you'd have learned by now that nobody wants to
read your sh.t.

That's right.  NOBODY.  So why are you hanging around?  Do you
_like_ abuse or is it the only way you can get any attention?

f.cking idiot.


Signature

John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

Eeyore - 29 Jul 2006 03:05 GMT
> Help Please,
>
> Can somebody explain to me what 80VA Means for a transformer with 2 x 12V
> outputs, and 240V inputs.
>
> What I am interested in is the max amps I can pull per 12v output.

Those outputs will each 'share' the 80VA i.e. 40VA each.

So each winding is good for 40/12 A = 3.33A

> If I connect the 2 off 12v outputs in parallel, does this mean I can pull
> double the current ?

In parallel that'll supply 12V @ 7.66A.

In series it'll supply 24V @ 3.33A.

Graham
Eeyore - 29 Jul 2006 03:06 GMT
> > Help Please,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> In parallel that'll supply 12V @ 7.66A.

ooops typo                        ^^^^^ 6.66 A

> In series it'll supply 24V @ 3.33A.
>
> Graham
Phil Allison - 29 Jul 2006 03:37 GMT
"Ian Tedridge"

> Can somebody explain to me what 80VA Means for a transformer with 2 x 12V
> outputs, and 240V inputs.

**  It means the transformer will *continuously*  supply 80 VA into to a
load while remaining at a safe operating temperature - providing:

1. The load VA is divided evenly between the two 12 volt secondary windings.

2. The AC load current is symmetrical about  + and - values,  ie no half
wave rectification is involved.

Note:

VA  =  total * rms * load current  x  rms voltage  (12 or 24 in this case)

........   Phil
Eeyore - 29 Jul 2006 06:30 GMT
> "Ian Tedridge"
> >
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> VA  =  total * rms * load current  x  rms voltage  (12 or 24 in this case)

With most kinds of ( typically capacitor input ) rectification to DC - the
current waveform crest factor / conduction angle influences the effective VA
rating though. I.e. derate for equivalent DC watts. Or looking at it another way
Irms is not equal to the normalised Iav for a sinewave.

Graham
Phil Allison - 29 Jul 2006 06:49 GMT
"Eeyore"

>> VA  =  total * rms * load current  x  rms voltage  (12 or 24 in this
>> case)
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> another way
> Irms is not equal to the normalised Iav for a sinewave.

**  All   TOTALLY  covered by the VA  figure since the definition of " VA "
REQUIRES the * rms * value of the load current to be used.

I must posted this at least 50 times on usenet .

So no f.cking need to tell me  -   you pommy nerd.

BTW

Is the change of name a public admission you are bipolar  ?

......    Phil
Eeyore - 29 Jul 2006 07:18 GMT
> "Eeyore"
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> So no f.cking need to tell me  -   you pommy nerd.

I appreciate that *you* know it but I'll bet many ppl think you can draw the
same 80W DC from a capacitor input rectifier connected to the same transformer.

Not many ppl own true rms meters either btw.

> BTW
>
> Is the change of name a public admission you are bipolar  ?

Nope. It was actually an indirect response to a nitwit in another group. It
amused me. Feel free to say I'm easily amused btw.

Graham
Phil Allison - 29 Jul 2006 07:40 GMT
"Eyesore"

>> So no f.cking need to tell me  -   you pommy nerd.
>
> I appreciate that *you* know it

** THEN  DO  **NOT**   f.cking  POST  IT  TO  ME  !!!!!!!!

     POST   IT  TO   THE   BLOODY  OP

    NOT UNDER  MY  WORDS   -   FUCKWIT   !!

>> Is the change of name a public admission you are bipolar  ?
>
> Nope.

**  Shame.

........  Phil
Eeyore - 29 Jul 2006 19:04 GMT
> "Eyesore"
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>      NOT UNDER  MY  WORDS   -   FUCKWIT   !!

I think you're being a teensy bit too sensitive here Phil. It wasn't meant as a
correction but an addition to what you said.

Graham
Phil Allison - 30 Jul 2006 04:15 GMT
"Eeysore"

>>>> So no f.cking need to tell me  -   you pommy nerd.
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> I think you're being a teensy bit too sensitive here Phil.

**  YOU have had many  WARNINGS  over doing the same thing.

That para reads like its a smartarse correction   -   no-one here can read
your bloody mind  !!

Post YOUR ideas to the OP.

If you are NOT foolishly attempting to correct me -  them make that CLEAR
!!!

.......    Phil
John  Larkin - 29 Jul 2006 19:18 GMT
>> "Eeyore"
>>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
>Graham

Phil is, apparently, never amused. Imagine living like that!

John
Michael A. Terrell - 29 Jul 2006 22:03 GMT
John Larkin wrote:

> >> "Eeyore"
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> John

 I can't.  I would put a bullet through my brain, first.

Signature

Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

Rich Grise - 31 Jul 2006 21:07 GMT
> John Larkin wrote:
>> On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 07:18:45 +0100, Eeyore
...
>> >> BTW
>> >>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>   I can't.  I would put a bullet through my brain, first.

I concur, but slapstick and a two- or three-word vocabulary consisting
primarily of cusswords can get a little tiresome. ;-)

Cheers!
Rich
jasen - 29 Jul 2006 06:22 GMT
> Help Please,
>
> Can somebody explain to me what 80VA Means for a transformer with 2 x 12V
> outputs, and 240V inputs.
>
> What I am interested in is the max amps I can pull per 12v output.

 80VA / ( 12A * 2 )
 
 about 3.33A
 
> If I connect the 2 off 12v outputs in parallel, does this mean I can pull
> double the current ?

usually, yes, but don't get one of them backewards.

that'd be about 6.66A
 
Bye.
  Jasen
Phil Allison - 29 Jul 2006 07:42 GMT
"jasen" <jasen@free.net.nz>

( snip yet  another ASININE copy cat post)

**  f.ck OFF  !!!!!!!!!!!

you  PITA,  f.cking  KIWI  COPY CAT

..........  Phil
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.