> How about Maplin's or Radio Spares?
>
> And, just for the record, Radio shack doesn't have 2N2222's - it
> has PN2222's, which are the plastic version. ;-) (Do I get any
> points for one-upping John P? ;-D )
Absolutely. But Radio Shack sells "2N2222"'s in a TO-92 package. Search
http://www.radioshack.com/home/index.jsp
for part # 276-1617
> And, depending on the circuit, it _could_ be replaced by almost
> any NPN small signal transistor, depending on which are the
> "important" specs in the app.
A common substitute might be 2N4401.
Pooh Bear - 27 Jan 2006 06:00 GMT
> > How about Maplin's or Radio Spares?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Absolutely. But Radio Shack sells "2N2222"'s in a TO-92 package.
If it's not TO-18 it's not a 2N2222 ! You mean a PN2222.
> Search
> http://www.radioshack.com/home/index.jsp
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> A common substitute might be 2N4401.
That's a switching transistor. I think its beta isn't that great. I've
suggested 2N3904 or BC548 as a decent 'better' sub.
Graham
ehsjr - 28 Jan 2006 05:03 GMT
>>>How about Maplin's or Radio Spares?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Graham
Fairchildsemi calls it a "General Purpose Amplifier".
The BC548 can't hold a candle to a PN2222 or a 2N4401
for Ic, and won't meet the op's spec for 600 mW. The 2N3904
might be ok, but it still trails the PN2222 and 2N4401 by a
huge margin (200 mA vs 500 mA) in Ic. Beta for the PN2222 or
2N4401 is far better at 100 mA (Ic) and above than the 2N3904,
and 100 mA is the maximum for the BC548.
If we knew that the op's circuit ran say 50 mA Ic, then, all
other conditions being equal, the BC548 or 2N3904 would be
good choices to replace the 2N or PN 2222. But not knowing,
the 2N4401 is a much better choice.
Ed
Rich Grise, but drunk - 28 Jan 2006 21:17 GMT
>> > How about Maplin's or Radio Spares?
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> If it's not TO-18 it's not a 2N2222 ! You mean a PN2222.
Careful, Pooh. I got in trouble only a few days ago, saying, "If it's not
plastic, it's not a 1N400X!" ;-) (well, I didn't say, "ex", but whichever
one it was - either 4004 or 4007, which other ones do they bother to
put on the market?)
And John, being cleverer than both of us put together, did enclose the
alleged part number in quotes. ;-)
> That's a switching transistor. I think its beta isn't that great. I've
> suggested 2N3904 or BC548 as a decent 'better' sub.
I'm too lazy to look up 2N3904 - isn't that one just a little less
robust than the venerable 2222?
Thanks!
Rich
Rich Grise - 28 Jan 2006 21:11 GMT
>> How about Maplin's or Radio Spares?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Absolutely. But Radio Shack sells "2N2222"'s in a TO-92 package. Search
> http://www.radioshack.com/home/index.jsp for part # 276-1617
>> And, depending on the circuit, it _could_ be replaced by almost any NPN
>> small signal transistor, depending on which are the "important" specs
>> in the app.
>
> A common substitute might be 2N4401.
Ah. Now I see where that other fellow got "2N222". ;-)
Thanks!
Rich