> >I would be grateful for suggestions on constructing a simple random noise
> >generator. Most of the noise should be within the audio spectrum.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> John
Thanks. Radioshack stuff is unavailable for me. The second option is more
in line with what I anticipated. Will one operational amplifier be
sufficient? I am not interested in the quality of the noise but merely
getting sufficient to drive a small speaker fairly hard.
Roger.
John Larkin - 27 Dec 2005 00:08 GMT
>> >I would be grateful for suggestions on constructing a simple random noise
>> >generator. Most of the noise should be within the audio spectrum.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
>Roger.
I's suggest two opamps, each with a closed-loop gain of, say 50, to
get you up to 100 millivolts RMS, then some sort of power amp to drive
the speaker, one of those cheap National thingies maybe. A single
opamp might work, ahead of the amp, depending on your numbers... x1000
at 3KHz requires at lease a 3 MHz gain-bandwidth opamp.
John
Roger Dewhurst - 27 Dec 2005 19:47 GMT
> I's suggest two opamps, each with a closed-loop gain of, say 50, to
> get you up to 100 millivolts RMS, then some sort of power amp to drive
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> John
Thanks. Would a 741op-amp drive a small speaker? If so would two or three
of these in series do the job? Would you bias the + input to half the
single supply voltage (12 volts) in each case and use 470pf capacitors
between the zener diode and the first stage, between each stage and between
the last stage and the speaker?
Roger
Jasen Betts - 28 Dec 2005 05:50 GMT
>> >"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in
> message
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Thanks. Would a 741op-amp drive a small speaker?
if your small speaker has an impedance of 50 or more ohms and ypu
don't need it very loud it could work.
an LM386 is a better choice for a small 4 or 8 ohm speaker.
Bye.
Jasen
John Larkin wrote:
> >I would be grateful for suggestions on constructing a simple random noise
> >generator. Most of the noise should be within the audio spectrum.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> make roughly 300 nV/rootHz noise density, or about 40 microvolts RMS
> in the audio KHz range.
Don't semiconductor junctions make excess shot noise though ?
> You can also make noise digitally, with a pseudo-random shift
> register. See AoE.
Nat Semi once made a chip that did that. I have a 'little box' I made using
one. Sounds horrid. You can hear the pattern.
Graham
p.s. I've sometimes heard shot noise referred to a Schott noise. Any idea
which is correct ?
John Larkin - 27 Dec 2005 00:03 GMT
>John Larkin wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>Don't semiconductor junctions make excess shot noise though ?
At this sort of current, zeners are pretty white and gaussian, maybe
just a tad asymmetric. At much lower currents, shot noise is
significant.
>> You can also make noise digitally, with a pseudo-random shift
>> register. See AoE.
>
> Nat Semi once made a chip that did that. I have a 'little box' I made using
>one. Sounds horrid. You can hear the pattern.
The sequence must have been short. A 1 MHz, 64-bit shift register
won't repeat in your lifetime.
>Graham
>
>p.s. I've sometimes heard shot noise referred to a Schott noise. Any idea
>which is correct ?
I think it's "shot", like buckshot falling on the roof.
John