Building Your Own Flyback Transformer
|
|
Thread rating:  |
mrdarrett@gmail.com - 27 Aug 2008 18:15 GMT A friend gave me a little yellow toroid (ferrite?) with a winding around it, that he had butchered from some non-working computer part.
I unwound the (thick!) wire, re-wound it with 10 turns of primary, and 50 turns of secondary.
I then built an astable multivibrator switching at 70 kHz, running off 3VDC, switching a TIP31, hoping to get a x5 multiplication of the voltage.
I got exactly 0 volts out of the secondary.
Why is this?
Is there a minimum voltage requirement for flyback transformers?
Similar effect with 6VDC on the primary side.
At first I thought the yellow ring may be made of plastic, but a neodymium magnet happily picks up the toroid...
I'm using an NTE587 fast switching diode on the secondary side.
Michael
default - 27 Aug 2008 19:57 GMT >A friend gave me a little yellow toroid (ferrite?) with a winding >around it, that he had butchered from some non-working computer part. [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > >Michael Have you put a scope on the primary to see if it is indeed toggling?
I assume your output is from the rectifier diode and filter cap on the secondary and that one side of the secondary is common to the meter?
Sounds like it ought to have some output if you connected it properly and it is toggling. The toroid material may not be ideal for the frequency you are using, but there still should be some output.
Duty cycle problem?
 Signature ----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
mrdarrett@gmail.com - 27 Aug 2008 20:00 GMT > >A friend gave me a little yellow toroid (ferrite?) with a winding > >around it, that he had butchered from some non-working computer part. [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > Have you put a scope on the primary to see if it is indeed toggling? I have no scope; I thought of using a sound card mic input + resistor, but the frequency's too high.
I'll cut the frequency down by a factor of 10 (to 7 kHz) and listen for a hum
> I assume your output is from the rectifier diode and filter cap on the > secondary and that one side of the secondary is common to the meter? Yep
> Sounds like it ought to have some output if you connected it properly > and it is toggling. The toroid material may not be ideal for the > frequency you are using, but there still should be some output. What's the ideal frequency for this toroid material? Is it really made of ferrite? I'm guessing it was from a noise suppression choke inductor...
Michael
Eeyore - 27 Aug 2008 22:40 GMT > What's the ideal frequency for this toroid material? Depends on the material. Anywhere from 20kHz - 1 GHz.
> Is it really made of ferrite? How would we know ? It might be metal powder. Post a pic of it.
> I'm guessing it was from a noise suppression choke > inductor... Making it completely useless as a power tranformer.
But - for flyback, the biggie is the air gap. That's where the energy is stored.
Graham
Joerg - 28 Aug 2008 17:33 GMT >> What's the ideal frequency for this toroid material? > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Making it completely useless as a power tranformer. Not at all, they can work quite well _if_ you keep any DC components out of the flux.
> But - for flyback, the biggie is the air gap. That's where the energy is > stored. Yep. Best would be to drive this core push-pull and capacitively coupled.
Michael, for heavier loads that can be done using a motor driver chip as they can be found in printers, disk drives and such. Make sure the rectification doesn't introduce DC flux and that there is a wee choke right between rectifier and first capacitor to even out the load on the driver.
 Signature Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM.
Eeyore - 29 Aug 2008 21:00 GMT > >> What's the ideal frequency for this toroid material? > > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > Not at all, they can work quite well _if_ you keep any DC components out > of the flux. Yabbut ! Many of those materials are made intentionally very lossy.
Graham
Joerg - 29 Aug 2008 23:24 GMT >>>> What's the ideal frequency for this toroid material? >>> Depends on the material. Anywhere from 20kHz - 1 GHz. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Yabbut ! Many of those materials are made intentionally very lossy. Less than you might think. I've sent quite a bit of energy across sub-penny class ferrite beads and none ever got hot.
 Signature Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM.
Eeyore - 30 Aug 2008 06:21 GMT > >>>> What's the ideal frequency for this toroid material? > >>> Depends on the material. Anywhere from 20kHz - 1 GHz. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > Less than you might think. I've sent quite a bit of energy across > sub-penny class ferrite beads and none ever got hot. The prices you design to never fail to amaze me.
Graham
Joerg - 30 Aug 2008 18:38 GMT >>>>>> What's the ideal frequency for this toroid material? >>>>> Depends on the material. Anywhere from 20kHz - 1 GHz. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > The prices you design to never fail to amaze me. Not always. What I am designing right now is more the "whatever it takes" kind. But even there one must keep later mass production in mind, it would not help anyone if I came up with a Princess on the Pea solution.
As for hand-wound stuff the world changes as well. Labor rates in Asia are picking up.
 Signature Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM.
John Popelish - 28 Aug 2008 00:22 GMT > What's the ideal frequency for this toroid material? Is it really > made of ferrite? I'm guessing it was from a noise suppression choke > inductor... There is no industry wide standard for color code of toroids.
Your core could be solid ferrite (high permeability, low saturation amp turns) or any one of a number of powdered iron formulas. Based on the heavy wire originally on the core, I suspect it is powdered iron with lots of air gap distributed all around the core between the iron grains.
As I said, different manufacturers use different color codes for their materials. For example: http://www.elnamagnetics.com/library/catalogs/MHW/MH&W%20International%20Powder% 20Cores.pdf http://www.uoguelph.ca/~antoon/circ/toroids.htm http://zeus.cedcc.psu.edu/ind/irontoroid.html http://www.qsl.net/ok1dxd/amidon.htm
A powdered iron core could work for a flyback design if the permeability were high enough. This doesn't explain your zero output, though, unless you have a very low permeability core.
 Signature Regards,
John Popelish
Joerg - 28 Aug 2008 22:03 GMT >> What's the ideal frequency for this toroid material? Is it really >> made of ferrite? I'm guessing it was from a noise suppression choke [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > were high enough. This doesn't explain your zero output, though, unless > you have a very low permeability core. Measuring where core saturation occurs is actually possible without a scope. Wind on three windings, 10 turns each or so. Run one to the soundcard output, one to the input. Start some level meter SW, FFT, or similar. Send an increasing amount of DC current through the third winding and see when the audio signal begins to drop off.
 Signature Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM.
Eeyore - 29 Aug 2008 21:04 GMT > There is no industry wide standard for color code of toroids. Would be damn handy if there was.
> Your core could be solid ferrite (high permeability, low > saturation amp turns) or any one of a number of powdered > iron formulas. Based on the heavy wire originally on the > core, I suspect it is powdered iron with lots of air gap > distributed all around the core between the iron grains. Especially if it's one colour on one side with another one the other. White and yellow are very popular. Damn, which company is that ? Big American one.
Graham
Joerg - 29 Aug 2008 23:58 GMT >> There is no industry wide standard for color code of toroids. > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Especially if it's one colour on one side with another one the other. White and yellow are very > popular. Damn, which company is that ? Big American one. Nope, it's Adidas:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ADIDAS-NEON-Yellow%2FWhite-Jersey-Mens-L-Soccer%2FTennis_W0Q QitemZ320291798931QQcmdZViewItemQQimsxZ20080827?IMSfp=TL0808271238r12282
But seriously, yellow and white is usually a hydrogen reduced EMI ferrite for low frequency stuff. MicroMetals uses the colors but so do others.
 Signature Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM.
Eeyore - 30 Aug 2008 06:22 GMT > >> There is no industry wide standard for color code of toroids. > > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > ferrite for low frequency stuff. MicroMetals uses the colors but so do > others. Micrometals were indeed the ones I had in mind.
Graham
mrdarrett@gmail.com - 27 Aug 2008 20:36 GMT Say... when I wound the secondary, I wound in exactly the same direction, overlapping the primary.
Was I supposed to wind the secondary in the opposite direction?
Michael
Eeyore - 27 Aug 2008 22:41 GMT > Say... when I wound the secondary, I wound in exactly the same > direction, overlapping the primary. > > Was I supposed to wind the secondary in the opposite direction? Hardly critical if you swap the leads over.
Graham
default - 28 Aug 2008 13:33 GMT >Say... when I wound the secondary, I wound in exactly the same >direction, overlapping the primary. > >Was I supposed to wind the secondary in the opposite direction? > >Michael It matters not a whit. Only time you care is when the phasing is critical to the operation - like the winding is a feedback to your oscillator circuit to keep it running.
Then you just swap the "start" with the "finish" to change the phase - no need to switch winding direction.
Without a scope you're handicapped. Oops, visually challenged. How do you know you are driving the toroid with a signal? You can do things like monitor current or use capacitive coupling and a diode to rectify the AC so your meter can read it, but a scope is lots better.
You also mentioned you only have 3 volts on the oscillator - you have to drive the switching transistor on the toroid with enough voltage and current to get it to saturate - you only need .7 volts with a bipolar transistor, but with enough current to switch. 70 KHZ might be too high for the circuit. Tip31 only has a gain of 25 at one amp collector current.
One easy circuit that almost always works is a blocking oscillator. One transistor with a tapped primary winding. Phase matters - the feedback winding has to be out of phase with the collector.
See http://www.cappels.org/dproj/ledpage/leddrv.htm
It isn't a high power circuit - but it can be - lower the bias resistance and use a cap around the resistor (drives it into conduction faster and harder). Start with the circuit shown until you get it working then experiment. The frequency will be dependent on a lot of factors. In the 50's we used them to drive loudspeakers and varied the frequency by putting the electrolytic feedback caps in series with the bias resistor and using variable resistors to change the pitch - I made a bike horn out of it and used it to look at resonance in mercury vials.
I wind the toroids with a doubled over piece of magnet wire (bifilar winding) then connect the start to the finish on one coil - this way I may still miscount the turns but the center tap will always be in the center. With ~15 turns of wire and no load on the circuit - the output can be as much as high as 90-100 - and it will fry a 2N4401 most of the time - so keep the led in the circuit; your TIP31 is only good for 40 volts.
no need to remove the wire you already have on, just wind over it
 Signature
----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
Rich Grise - 27 Aug 2008 21:13 GMT On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:15:19 -0700, mrdarrett wrote:
> A friend gave me a little yellow toroid (ferrite?) with a winding > around it, that he had butchered from some non-working computer part. [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > I'm using an NTE587 fast switching diode on the secondary side. Are you running this single-ended? What provision have you made for the half-cycle when the transistor is off - where does the flux go? IOW, how are you resetting the core to prevent it walking away into saturation-land? ;-)
Good Luck! Rich
mrdarrett@gmail.com - 27 Aug 2008 21:20 GMT > On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:15:19 -0700, mrdarrett wrote: > > A friend gave me a little yellow toroid (ferrite?) with a winding [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > Good Luck! > Rich The flux hits the diode, can't *quite* break it, then thinks, "Hmm, maybe I'd better wait here for a few microseconds until the next pulse arrives."
:-) I'm a newbie at flyback transformers. (That's why I'm testing mine at low voltage, lest I unwittingly emit subatomic particles in my living room.) Is there a better way to do this, than just have one ultrafast diode + filter cap in the secondary?
Michael
Eeyore - 27 Aug 2008 22:37 GMT > I'm a newbie at flyback transformers. (That's why I'm testing mine at > low voltage, lest I unwittingly emit subatomic particles in my living > room.) Is there a better way to do this, than just have one ultrafast > diode + filter cap in the secondary? Read some app notes. Google will help.
Graham
Joerg - 28 Aug 2008 02:15 GMT >> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:15:19 -0700, mrdarrett wrote: >>> A friend gave me a little yellow toroid (ferrite?) with a winding [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > room.) Is there a better way to do this, than just have one ultrafast > diode + filter cap in the secondary? Flyback xfmrs need an airgap, you toroid probably doesn't have one.
 Signature Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM.
mrdarrett@gmail.com - 29 Aug 2008 06:44 GMT On Aug 27, 6:15 pm, Joerg <notthisjoerg...@removethispacbell.net> wrote: .....
> Flyback xfmrs need an airgap, you toroid probably doesn't have one. > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. > Use another domain or send PM. Thanks to all for the replies.
Turns out my astable multivibrator wasn't multivibrating at all - using a 555, I got it to work, kinda. My DMM measured 5VAC across the secondary. Strange, since this is about what I fed it with on the input (6VDC, switched, minus the drop from the TIP31A) - but it could be the high frequency confused my DMM. I was out of alligator clips, else I would have added the ultrafast diode and cap on the output - I measured it raw...
More study needed, when I have more spare time... it's the kids' bedtime now...
Michael
Joerg - 29 Aug 2008 19:15 GMT > On Aug 27, 6:15 pm, Joerg <notthisjoerg...@removethispacbell.net> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > More study needed, when I have more spare time... it's the kids' > bedtime now... Just don't expect much out of a TIP31. The 555 doesn't have enough muscle to drive it properly. So wear goggles, seriously, because with stuff like this parts can go, in chemistry speak, "exotherm".
 Signature Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM.
mrdarrett@gmail.com - 29 Aug 2008 19:57 GMT On Aug 29, 11:15 am, Joerg <notthisjoerg...@removethispacbell.net> wrote:
> mrdarr...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Aug 27, 6:15 pm, Joerg <notthisjoerg...@removethispacbell.net> [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. > Use another domain or send PM. Thanks for the goggle reminder. (I wear glasses, so, for years, I was exempt from the goggle requirement in the undergrad chem labs. No contact lenses in the chem labs... no no no... the solvents would dissolve your contacts while on your eye...)
I think I'll try an IRF530 then, since my TIP31A won't do. (Or I could try paralleling 4 2N2222s...) For a mosfet, that means I have to increase the gate drive voltage to 10V or so, right? Scary. For safety's sake I think I'll use a "safety resistor" in series with my primary coil and the mosfet. A 12V lamp should do...
And you're right, it's more fun to adopt a "deserted islander mentality" and do this on the cheap, which is partly why I opted to go discrete for the multivibrator instead of using a 555. On the other extreme, I could just BUY 6 lead acid batteries and connect them in series to get my big voltages... but what's the fun in that...
Michael
mrdarrett@gmail.com - 27 Aug 2008 21:27 GMT > On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:15:19 -0700, mrdarrett wrote: > > A friend gave me a little yellow toroid (ferrite?) with a winding [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > Good Luck! > Rich Would use of an ultrafast bridge rectifier avoid the free, all- expenses paid admission to Saturation-Land?
Michael
Paul E. Schoen - 28 Aug 2008 17:38 GMT >> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:15:19 -0700, mrdarrett wrote: >> > A friend gave me a little yellow toroid (ferrite?) with a winding [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > Would use of an ultrafast bridge rectifier avoid the free, all- > expenses paid admission to Saturation-Land? It does not seem worthwhile to spend time and energy to do experiments on unknown circuit components, especially without the necessary equipment, like a scope or an LCR meter. Either of these can be obtained very inexpensively, especially if you are willing to get an older model and perhaps do a little repair work (which can be educational as well).
You can purchase toroidal cores with full specifications from DigiKey for a few dollars, and then you can wind transformers that will perform predictably. You can also probably get samples on-line.
For the test equipment and the cores, eBay can be your friend, and also check out any local Hamfests that have electronic flea markets.
I would also suggest drawing up your circuit in LTspice, although transformer modeling can be tricky. You could start with a sample circuit for a flyback converter (5v 12v 20mA 1316.asc). It has a transformer model that will work for what you are trying to do. It has a 40 uH primary and a 640 uH secondary, which is a ratio of 4:1.
Paul
Joerg - 29 Aug 2008 19:27 GMT >>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:15:19 -0700, mrdarrett wrote: >>>> A friend gave me a little yellow toroid (ferrite?) with a winding [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > inexpensively, especially if you are willing to get an older model and > perhaps do a little repair work (which can be educational as well). It depends. Sometimes it can be quite sporty to pretend "What if I am on a lonely island and only my laptop and these few parts?" You can get a similar circuit going (not with the TIP31 though, and with a forward concept) using just the sound card and a $2.99 Harborfreight multimeter.
Of course, on that island your laptop battery would croak after two hours so you've got to be done by then ;-)
But seriously, I was in such situations more than once. Client had a circuit issue that turned out to be a really nasty noise intrusion from somewhere. But from where, and what's the path? Next to nothing in suitable equipment, just my trusty laptop with its 18bit sound card. However, we needed an iso xfmr that went down to 5Hz and mine quits at 15Hz or so. So we took a mains iso transformer and roached phono jacks onto it. Of course this just had to be the day the regular OSHA inspection happened. One engineer turned pale when he saw that. "Put that away!" ... "Why? We need it right now." ... "Cause the OSHA guy is next door" ... "Dee-deedle-dum, don't turn around, the commissar's in town, dee-deedle-dum" ... "Stop that!" (I know the guys quite well, else I would have pulled that Falco song)
 Signature Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM.
Paul E. Schoen - 30 Aug 2008 21:30 GMT > It depends. Sometimes it can be quite sporty to pretend "What if I am on > a lonely island and only my laptop and these few parts?" You can get a [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > dee-deedle-dum" ... "Stop that!" (I know the guys quite well, else I > would have pulled that Falco song) It is useful to pull a MacGuiver once in a while. A few years ago I was on a troubleshooting job at NSA and I found that a glitch in a logic circuit was causing it to malfunction, and it was preventing the use of a $50,000 piece of equipment used for critical circuit breaker calibration. I figured that a small capacitor would fix it, but we didn't bring an assortment of parts, and their cal lab didn't have that sort of thing either. It would have been very difficult to go back out through security and go somewhere to get some parts and then come back in, and we really needed to get this test set up and running. Luckily, someone had a broken multimeter that we were able to cannibalize and get a capacitor that fixed the problem. So they were able to get their testing done, and national security (or at least my job security) was once again assured.
There should be a techie version of "Survivor" that require the participants to use electronic junk to cobble together some sort of circuit that allows them to get out of situations.
Paul
mrdarrett@gmail.com - 30 Aug 2008 21:48 GMT > > It depends. Sometimes it can be quite sporty to pretend "What if I am on > > a lonely island and only my laptop and these few parts?" You can get a [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > > Paul Wow, that would make a great show!
Michael
Eeyore - 30 Aug 2008 23:11 GMT > > > It depends. Sometimes it can be quite sporty to pretend "What if I am on > > > a lonely island and only my laptop and these few parts?" You can get a [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > > Michael It sounds promising. An electronic 'Scrapyard Challenge' kind of.
Graham
Jasen Betts - 31 Aug 2008 10:18 GMT >> There should be a techie version of "Survivor" that require the >> participants to use electronic junk to cobble together some sort of circuit >> that allows them to get out of situations. > > Wow, that would make a great show! sounds like junkyard wars, but with added politics.
Bye. Jasen
Joerg - 31 Aug 2008 19:02 GMT >> It depends. Sometimes it can be quite sporty to pretend "What if I am on >> a lonely island and only my laptop and these few parts?" You can get a [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > participants to use electronic junk to cobble together some sort of circuit > that allows them to get out of situations.
:-) I once went around and asked whether someone had an older portable transistor radio. "What for?" ... "Well, I need the little audio transformer in there and I'll pay $20" ... "Twenty bucks? Deal! Here!"
BTW, next time that happens ask if there is a RadioShack nearby. One that hasn't mutated into a cell phone shop like ours did. They have little Smorgasbord-kits for a few Dollars, containing a nice mix or ceramic through-hole capacitors. I have been known to do Viking-style raids on RadioShacks near clients. Once we had a pile of a dozen clamp-on ferrites and it still wasn't enough. "Oh, I'll just hop over to RadioShack" ... "Ahm, that's where these came from, I cleaned out all four stores around here yesterday evening".
 Signature Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM.
Rich Grise - 28 Aug 2008 23:48 GMT On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 13:27:47 -0700, mrdarrett wrote:
>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:15:19 -0700, mrdarrett wrote: >> > A friend gave me a little yellow toroid (ferrite?) with a winding [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > Would use of an ultrafast bridge rectifier avoid the free, all- > expenses paid admission to Saturation-Land? I'd have to look it up; I'd probably put "flyback tutorial" or something in google search.
Good Luck! Rich
mrdarrett@gmail.com - 29 Aug 2008 20:04 GMT > On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 13:27:47 -0700, mrdarrett wrote: > >> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:15:19 -0700, mrdarrett wrote: [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > Good Luck! > Rich GREAT idea! Flyback Converters for Dummies http://www.dos4ever.com/flyback/flyback.html
I never would have guessed... just like I wouldn't ever expect "Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations for Dummies" either...
Michael
Joerg - 30 Aug 2008 00:05 GMT >> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 13:27:47 -0700, mrdarrett wrote: >>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:15:19 -0700, mrdarrett wrote: [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > Flyback Converters for Dummies > http://www.dos4ever.com/flyback/flyback.html Excellent tutorial. I'd save many miles on the freeway if everyone would be familiar with the scope plot in figure six. When you see that shark fin it's time for duck and cover.
> I never would have guessed... just like I wouldn't ever expect > "Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations for Dummies" either... A few days ago I saw a book "The Bible for Dummies". At first it shocked me a bit but hey, whatever it takes.
Anyhow your IRF530 is a lot better than the TIP31 but keep in mind that whatever is driving it needs to wallop the 700pF gate capacitance around and it needs to push it up to 10V. And fast.
 Signature Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM.
mrdarrett@gmail.com - 30 Aug 2008 21:53 GMT On Aug 29, 4:05 pm, Joerg <notthisjoerg...@removethispacbell.net> wrote: ...
> > GREAT idea! > > Flyback Converters for Dummies [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > be familiar with the scope plot in figure six. When you see that shark > fin it's time for duck and cover. Figure 16 has pretty much what I was trying to do, but better - brilliant use of the 555 feedback pin! But... No protection diode for the mosfet, though? And no capacitor to block the DC?
Shark fin... well, at least it guarantees income, right? :)
> > I never would have guessed... just like I wouldn't ever expect > > "Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations for Dummies" either... [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > whatever is driving it needs to wallop the 700pF gate capacitance around > and it needs to push it up to 10V. And fast. Can my 555's output pin 3 handle it? Should I use a resistor in series with the gate, or don't bother...?
> -- > Regards, Joerg [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. > Use another domain or send PM. Thanks,
Michael
Joerg - 31 Aug 2008 18:50 GMT > On Aug 29, 4:05 pm, Joerg <notthisjoerg...@removethispacbell.net> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > brilliant use of the 555 feedback pin! But... No protection diode for > the mosfet, though? And no capacitor to block the DC? What diode, and why block DC? Big MOSFETs carry a staunch parasitic body diode that can often handle around the same current the MOSFET itself can take. DC flux: That's why you must use a gapped core here. A non-gapped core will run away within tens of usec ... kablouie.
> Shark fin... well, at least it guarantees income, right? :) Yeah, except some of the proto boards I get fill the lab with such a burn stench that I have to keep the windows open even in winter.
>>> I never would have guessed... just like I wouldn't ever expect >>> "Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations for Dummies" either... [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Can my 555's output pin 3 handle it? Should I use a resistor in > series with the gate, or don't bother...? I rarely use gate resistors. But if the trace/wire length is more than 1/2" total including FET pin length you might want to slip a ferrite bead over it or hang 20-30 ohms in series (right at the FET).
 Signature Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM.
mrdarrett@gmail.com - 03 Sep 2008 21:02 GMT On Aug 31, 10:50 am, Joerg <notthisjoerg...@removethispacbell.net> wrote:
...
If I build a Boost converter instead of a transformer, does my inductor still need an air gap?
(figure 3): http://www.dos4ever.com/flyback/flyback.html
Thanks,
Michael
John Popelish - 04 Sep 2008 00:04 GMT > On Aug 31, 10:50 am, Joerg <notthisjoerg...@removethispacbell.net> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > (figure 3): > http://www.dos4ever.com/flyback/flyback.html Yes. It makes no difference whether the boost (flyback) converter has an isolated output winding or gets the output off the primary winding. Both versions alternately store input energy in a magnetic field, then dump that energy to the output. Solid ferrite does not store very much energy before saturating, but the air gap in the flux path stores lots more energy per volume than the ferrite core material does.
 Signature Regards,
John Popelish
Joerg - 04 Sep 2008 16:03 GMT >> On Aug 31, 10:50 am, Joerg <notthisjoerg...@removethispacbell.net> >> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > energy before saturating, but the air gap in the flux path stores lots > more energy per volume than the ferrite core material does. I rarely use gapped cores, for two reasons. They are almost never catalog parts and they can cause EMI headaches. In a boost you can be fine with a non-gapped core as long as you keep the peak current from saturating the core. This is one of the reasons why my designs are almost exclusively current-mode. Reduces the kablouie factor quite a bit ;-)
 Signature Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM.
Eeyore - 27 Aug 2008 22:36 GMT > A friend gave me a little yellow toroid (ferrite?) with a winding > around it, that he had butchered from some non-working computer part. Well for starters, for flyback you tend to need a core with an air gap !
Go to powerint.com and read all their app notes.
Graham
|
|
|