> This post frightens away the nut jobs.
> Not all that surprising.

Signature
http://improve-usenet.org/index.html
If you have broadband, your ISP may have a NNTP news server included in
your account: http://www.usenettools.net/ISP.htm
Sporadic E is the Earth's aluminum foil beanie for the 'global warming'
sheep.
> > This post frightens away the nut jobs.
>
> Not true.
Then why did you dodge the issue?
Here, we'll try again:
> > InnoCentive found that “the further the problem was from the
> > solver’s expertise, the
> > : more likely they were to solve it,” often by applying specialized
> > knowledge or
> > : instruments developed for another purpose.
> Interdisciplinarity is the act of drawing from two or more academic
> disciplines and integrating their insights to work together in pursuit
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> warming) to be dealt with using the knowledge and methodology of just
> one discipline.
> Interdisciplinary programs sometimes arise from a shared conviction
> that the traditional disciplines are unable or unwilling to address an
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> interdisciplinarians are able to acknowledge and combat the present
> and future problems of humanity.
> At another level, interdisciplinarity is seen as a remedy to the
> intellectually deadening effects of excessive specialization. On some
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> involved. Therefore, both disciplinarians and interdisciplinarians
> must work complementary to each other in order to solve problems.
> However, French sociologist and interdisciplinary scholar, Mattei
> Dogan has criticized the widely held view that interdisciplinarity,
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> meaning of interdisciplinarity lies in crossing specialties within
> disciplines, or the hybridization of disciplinary fragments
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interdisciplinarity
> >http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/22/science/22inno.html?em&ex=121695840...
> > Several reasons for all the upstaging by those outside their fields
> > including:
> > 1. The field jumper will often focus on issues eitirely overlooked by
> > those who do not stray from their field.
> > 2. The field jumper brings fresh insights from his own field.
> > 3. The field jumper isn't going to have the same prejudices of those
> > stuck in their field.
> > 4. The field jumper will naturally be a little brash. ("Waddya mean
> > we can't do it?")
> > A prof told us about crosspollination/cross training years ago, I've
> > heard it several times since and I've posted about it several times
> > over the years.
> > My favorite example was MRI, invented by a chemist who for some reason
> > had to work with physicists.
> > DOE would do well to have a program which paid scientists and
> > engineers to switch fields for 6 months - year.
> > Most of the breakthroughs come in the first 6 months.
This time, no dodgin'
Bret Cahill