Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsElectronicsBasicsRepairDesignCADComponentsEquipmentElectrical Engineering
ElectronicsKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Electronics Forum / Electronics / February 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Electrons on video

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Phil Allison - 27 Feb 2008 05:32 GMT
** This is worth a look.

If you have never seen an electron in motion before ...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23336318/

.....  Phil
David L. Jones - 27 Feb 2008 06:01 GMT
> ** This is worth a look.
>
> If you have never seen an electron in motion before ...
>
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23336318/

I expected something so ground breaking to be a tad more exciting :-(
Not exactly up there with say the Hubble deep field photo.

Dave.
fritz - 27 Feb 2008 22:35 GMT
> > ** This is worth a look.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Dave.

Werner Heisenberg must be stirring in his grave.......

It's not possible to see an electron without changing its velocity.....
Bristan - 27 Feb 2008 23:29 GMT
Yeah, sort of conflicts with the uncertainty principle a bit.
The things people will do to get you to watch an add
Sucks a few in .

>> > ** This is worth a look.
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> It's not possible to see an electron without changing its velocity.....
pom - 28 Feb 2008 09:06 GMT
fritz a écrit :

> Werner Heisenberg must be stirring in his grave.......
>
> It's not possible to see an electron without changing its velocity.....
Hello
I think it would be better to read the relating papers first in order to
know what they are talking about....
Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 073003 (2008) is a start.
Peter
fritz - 28 Feb 2008 10:18 GMT
> fritz a écrit :
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 073003 (2008) is a start.
> Peter

I saw that reference, have you actually read it ?
Please post a weblink, or a summary of the paper.

In any case, all I did was state a fact, meaning that you cannot actually 'see'
an electron orbiting in the way the misleading heading implied.
pom - 28 Feb 2008 18:34 GMT
fritz a écrit :
>> fritz a écrit :
>>> Werner Heisenberg must be stirring in his grave.......
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> In any case, all I did was state a fact, meaning that you cannot actually 'see'
> an electron orbiting in the way the misleading heading implied.

Hello.
well, I read the abstract,enough to show me that the authors' goal was
NOT to image "an electron".
There are already many successful experiments manipulating single
electrons by observing evidence of their location. Sherlock Holmes would
have been delighted...

A Google-search with "mauritsson et al." will give you the references to
several papers on their experiments and conclusions.

It all has to do with interaction between electrons and electromagnetic
fields or, if suitable, photons.
The news about this experiment was written by journalists, they tend to
insist heavily on the more "scoopish" aspects in detriment to physical
aspects.
 I would credit the authors, doing a very refined and difficult
experiment, with some sense of what they are doing.
Bristan - 28 Feb 2008 21:31 GMT
> fritz a écrit :
(snip)

> Hello.
> well, I read the abstract,enough to show me that the authors' goal was NOT
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>  I would credit the authors, doing a very refined and difficult
> experiment, with some sense of what they are doing.

Well there a many small particles that can be identified by evidence of
their locations.... neutrinos etc
That is an entirely different to "seeing"an actual particle.
The web reference is a complete fraud and you shouldn't give it credibility
for the sake of nitpicking
David L. Jones - 29 Feb 2008 00:44 GMT
> (snip)
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> their locations.... neutrinos etc
> That is an entirely different to "seeing"an actual particle.

As an aside, I saw a cloud chamber in operation for the first time a
few weeks back at the Exploratorium in San Francisco. Very cool, and
very eerie being able to "see" cosmic radiation particles and their
path, many of them passing right through you. I always knew about
this, but "seeing it" for real makes you think WOW!

Dave.
Michael A. Terrell - 29 Feb 2008 07:41 GMT
> As an aside, I saw a cloud chamber in operation for the first time a
> few weeks back at the Exploratorium in San Francisco. Very cool, and
> very eerie being able to "see" cosmic radiation particles and their
> path, many of them passing right through you. I always knew about
> this, but "seeing it" for real makes you think WOW!

  Do you think they can pass through Phil's thick skull?

Signature

Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.