Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsElectronicsBasicsRepairDesignCADComponentsEquipmentElectrical Engineering
ElectronicsKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Electronics Forum / Electronics / January 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Repacking drill battery

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Russ - 23 Jan 2008 22:52 GMT
I've got an 18v battery drill whose pack is just about completely dead. I've
been thinking about repacking it, but I'd really like to use
high-performance NiMH batteries in place of the current NiCads. The question
is, will the existing temperature sensor still work for terminating the
charge, or is the temp change for NiMHs too different?
Phil Allison - 23 Jan 2008 23:13 GMT
"Russ"

> I've got an 18v battery drill whose pack is just about completely dead.
> I've been thinking about repacking it, but I'd really like to use
> high-performance NiMH batteries in place of the current NiCads. The
> question is, will the existing temperature sensor still work for
> terminating the charge, or is the temp change for NiMHs too different?

** Probably will be OK -  but check the rating on that temp sensor.

NiMH cells can be damaged by overcharging and overheating.

This link ,with seems pretty comprehensive, suggests 45 degrees C is the max
temp before charging at  1C ( ie 1.5 hours to full charge)  must terminate.

http://www.powerstream.com/NiMH.htm

.......   Phil
Russ - 24 Jan 2008 01:33 GMT
> "Russ"
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> terminate.
> http://www.powerstream.com/NiMH.htm

Cheers Phil - I'll open up the pack and have a look at the sensor.
L.A.T. - 23 Jan 2008 23:14 GMT
> I've got an 18v battery drill whose pack is just about completely dead.
> I've been thinking about repacking it, but I'd really like to use
> high-performance NiMH batteries in place of the current NiCads. The
> question is, will the existing temperature sensor still work for
> terminating the charge, or is the temp change for NiMHs too different?

Silicon Chip recently had an article about this sort of thing.
Worth a read, if only to discourage you.
Russ - 24 Jan 2008 01:28 GMT
>> I've got an 18v battery drill whose pack is just about completely
>> dead. I've been thinking about repacking it, but I'd really like to
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Silicon Chip recently had an article about this sort of thing.
> Worth a read, if only to discourage you.

I think I might have seen that one - is that where they came up with a
ridiculously complicated charger to add temp sensing to cheapo drill packs?
The whole article seemed to be motivated by Jaycar stocking (overpriced)
Sub-C NiCads and needing something to help shift the buggers.
Clifford Heath - 23 Jan 2008 23:15 GMT
> will the existing temperature sensor still work for terminating the
> charge, or is the temp change for NiMHs too different?

I can't answer you question, but I've opened several brands of
recharger for 14.4 and 18 volt drill batteries, and none of them
had anything connected to the temperature sensor.

Just a possibly-relevant data point :-)

Clifford Heath.
ian field - 24 Jan 2008 15:30 GMT
>> will the existing temperature sensor still work for terminating the
>> charge, or is the temp change for NiMHs too different?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Clifford Heath.

Some of the one's I've opened had encapsulated bi-metal strip cut-outs.

It would be better for the OP to stick with NiCd if that's what's used
originally, NiMh are not as good for high discharge current and easier to
damage by overcharging.
Russ - 24 Jan 2008 22:26 GMT
>>> will the existing temperature sensor still work for terminating the
>>> charge, or is the temp change for NiMHs too different?
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> originally, NiMh are not as good for high discharge current and
> easier to damage by overcharging.

That was true maybe 10 years ago, but these days you can get NiMHs that
out-perform NiCads in both capacity and current delivery. I am concerned
about overcharging though.
Phil Allison - 24 Jan 2008 23:30 GMT
"Russ"
ian field wrote:

>> It would be better for the OP to stick with NiCd if that's what's used
>> originally, NiMh are not as good for high discharge current and
>> easier to damage by overcharging.
>
> That was true maybe 10 years ago, but these days you can get NiMHs that
> out-perform NiCads in both capacity and current delivery.

** The shortest safe discharge time for NiCds is about two minutes  -   as
used by model boat and model plane hobbyists.

Good quality sub-C cells will deliver 50 amps at about 1.1 volts this way.

Modern NiMH  sub-C cells can also be discharged in two minutes,  while
delivering up to 100 amps, since they have about twice the Ah capacity.

An electric drill normally draws far less current and so is no problem.

.......   Phil
TonyR - 31 Jan 2008 01:38 GMT
At the risk of being a pain... if you are going to replace the batteries
completely, Lithium Polymers are the way to go. Varta (as one supplier)
will help out with charger application circuits too
Phil Allison - 31 Jan 2008 01:49 GMT
"TonyR"

> At the risk of being a pain..

**  No risk involved, mate  -   YOU  are a 100%  pain.

> if you are going to replace the batteries
> completely, Lithium Polymers are the way to go.

** Straight down the pathway to hell................

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium-polymer

There are enormous problems with overcharging and over discharging.

Plus a 2 to 3 year limit on life, whether used or not.

Bad news for the OP's drill.

......  Phil
Russ - 31 Jan 2008 11:06 GMT
> At the risk of being a pain... if you are going to replace the
> batteries completely, Lithium Polymers are the way to go. Varta (as
> one supplier) will help out with charger application circuits too

I've actually had a lot of experience with Lithium Polymer  cells in
electric R/C planes, but there are a number of catches - I have a charger
that will do Lipos, but not 18V worth, but that aside, the big issue is that
lipos need careful management when in use - if you exceed their maxiumum
discharge rate, they'll die very quickly, and in the worst case, swell up
and explode - without some clever electronics, this would be a hard thing to
take care of in a drill where it's not uncommon to stall the motor.
Similarly, if they are allowed to discharge to too low a voltage, they'll
also fail prematurely.

With R/C electric planes, you can carefully choose the combination of motor,
gearbox and propellor such that you know the maxiumum current draw and match
it to the lipos you are using (or vice versa), and the speed controllers are
quite smart - particularly the brushless ones (brushless motors are pretty
much standard now) and can be programmed to sense the appropriate low
voltage point and either wind back the power, shut off, or pulse the power
to indicate to the pilot that it's time to land.

Given the huge advances in brushless motor, controller and battery
technology in the R/C field, I kind of wonder why you don't see more of it
flowing over into power tools, although it is kind of happening slowly with
the introduction of Lithium Ion-powered drills (still with brushed motors),
but they cost a bloody fortune.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.