CFL poor performance (=total rubbish)
|
|
Thread rating:  |
RMD - 22 Feb 2007 05:11 GMT Hi All,
I'm already stocking up on incandescent lamps. I figure a six-pack of incandescent lamps will cover me for a year, and it isn't too expensive to buy a lifetimes supply. About $30-40 worth of lamps ought see me out.
Frankly I've given CFL's a good try and the performance is pathetic. Most of the performance claims just verge on fraud in my book.
Damn things are dim, and get dimmer as they age. Checking them with a light-meter I just don't believe the claims made for 60W light output from 8W, or whatever they claim. I can't even read newsprint under an alleged 60W equivalent CFL.
And as for the claimed 8000 hours life, you must be joking. I've tried quite a few in high use applications and none have lasted as long as a normal incandescent bulb.
It is actually quite easy to buy a cheap incandescent light globe that works well and gives quite reasonable service.
I think the manufacturers need to do some heavy work on improving the quality and reliability of CFL's. They are just total rubbish in my book. Only a fanatic greenie could love these stupid things.
Just telling you what I think. :) Not holding anything back here. :)
Ross
(To get email address ROT 13) ebff_qnyl@lnubb.pbz
Phil Allison - 22 Feb 2007 05:50 GMT "RMD"
> Hi All, > > I'm already stocking up on incandescent lamps. I figure a six-pack of > incandescent lamps will cover me for a year, and it isn't too > expensive to buy a lifetimes supply. About $30-40 worth of lamps ought > see me out. ** I'm sure heaps of folk will do just the same.
> Frankly I've given CFL's a good try and the performance is pathetic. > Most of the performance claims just verge on fraud in my book. ** Ditto here.
> Damn things are dim, and get dimmer as they age. Checking them with a > light-meter I just don't believe the claims made for 60W light output [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Just telling you what I think. :) Not holding anything back here. :) ** Two things have to happen before folk can trust CFLs to perform as claimed and not become a pollution issue.
1. The regulators create a mark of proven quality and conformity to acceptable standards that all CFLs makers have to earn and then can apply to their products.
2. All sellers are required to accept used examples back for proper re-cycling.
....... Phil
Bruce Varley - 22 Feb 2007 07:13 GMT > Hi All, > [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > (To get email address ROT 13) > ebff_qnyl@lnubb.pbz Anyway, where does this quoted 1000 hour mean life for incandescents come from? In our house there's no doubt that it's way longer for most of the globes we use. Nearly all of our failures are with particular fittings, for some reason, maybe heat dissipation. For the rest, we go for years without changing a globe, even the ones that get used a lot.
Mr.T - 22 Feb 2007 07:18 GMT > Anyway, where does this quoted 1000 hour mean life for incandescents come > from? It comes from the days when such figures were conservative test results, rather than a figment of some advertising copywriters imagination.
MrT.
Phil Allison - 23 Feb 2007 03:04 GMT "Bruce Varley"
> Anyway, where does this quoted 1000 hour mean life for incandescents come > from? In our house there's no doubt that it's way longer for most of the > globes we use. Nearly all of our failures are with particular fittings, > for some reason, maybe heat dissipation. For the rest, we go for years > without changing a globe, even the ones that get used a lot. ** It don't hardly matter if an incandescent lamp lasts 1000 or maybe 2000 hours since the energy bill is already up to around 10 times its purchase at 1000 hours.
Plus so called " long life " bulbs simply put out less light and so are more expensive to use.
A CFL however must last well OVER 1000 hours just to break even in cost with an ordinary incandescent - depends how much the particular CFL cost.
The savings being claimed only happen if the life is 5000 hours or more.
By which time, most of them are either too faint to use for most lighting job or dead.
....... Phil
Mr.T - 23 Feb 2007 05:08 GMT > A CFL however must last well OVER 1000 hours just to break even in cost with > an ordinary incandescent - depends how much the particular CFL cost. Which is the problem of course, since MANY fail to do so. My *average* is certainly less than that. And some cost over $10. IME I could buy and run a normal 60W globe for the life of the CFL, for less than the purchase price of the CFL in nearly all cases.
MrT.
David L. Jones - 22 Feb 2007 08:59 GMT > Hi All, > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > quite a few in high use applications and none have lasted as long as a > normal incandescent bulb. I've had CFL's last for more than 8000 hours, so it's not just marketing bullshit, they CAN achieve that. Yes, some brands are crap, but others are excellent. Some brands and models take ages to warm up, others are instant to full brightness. Some fade with time, others don't, even after 8000 hours.
I'm using some of these new Megaman 11W Halogen replacement ones and they claim 15,000 hours. http://www.neco.com.au/product.asp?pID=168&cID=47 http://www.megamanuk.com/technology/ingenium.php They do take a long time to warm up though, worst than any other CFL I have tried.
Dave :)
Marc - 22 Feb 2007 21:59 GMT >........... > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > They do take a long time to warm up though, worst than any other CFL I > have tried. Hi Dave, Can you mention these brands and models that are excellent, quick to full brightness, and don't fade?
 Signature Cheers,
Marc
* My email address requires the identical words and * underscores removed to email me
Mr.T - 23 Feb 2007 04:57 GMT > > I've had CFL's last for more than 8000 hours, so it's not just > > marketing bullshit, they CAN achieve that. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Can you mention these brands and models that are excellent, quick to full > brightness, and don't fade? Yes, I'd love to know too. I've tried many brands and they were all crap IMO. NONE lasted even close to 4000 hours, let alone 8000 hours. One DOA and a few lasted less than 100 hours. At a guess my current average would be around 500 hours, possibly less. Have finally given up buying them, my hope that they might improve was in vain I'm afraid.
MrT.
Chris Jones - 24 Feb 2007 22:42 GMT >>........... >> [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > Can you mention these brands and models that are excellent, quick to full > brightness, and don't fade? In the UK I have been using Osram ones and I am very happy with them. There are two Osram ranges in the shops here, a cheaper range that I have never tried and a better range (Osram Dulux EL Longlife) that I find to be very good indeed. They are made in Germany, rated for 15000 hours and I have been using them exclusively in my house for several years now and I have never had one fail, though I did smash one by accident. They are rated for 500000 on-off cycles so I have been switching them on and off just as much as I would with incandescent bulbs and have had no problems. They start so fast that there is no noticeable delay. At the moment in the UK they can be bought at Sainsbury's for 60 pence each though the usual price is more like 2.20 pounds = $5.50 The only problem I have had is that they don't fit into some light fittings because they are longer than incandescent bulbs. http://www.osram.com/products/general/compact/professionals/dulux_longlife.html I could also find them in the catalog on the Australian website but the URL wouldn't work when I copied it because the use all kinds of scripty crap on their website.
Chris
Phil Allison - 24 Feb 2007 23:06 GMT "Chris Jones"
> In the UK I have been using Osram ones and I am very happy with them. > There [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > bulbs. > http://www.osram.com/products/general/compact/professionals/dulux_longlife.html ** LOL !!
The seems to be a major error with the data on that page.
500,000 cycles of 90 mins on and 15 off adds up to 750,000 hours on !!
Just on 85 years of life !!!!
> I could also find them in the catalog on the Australian website but the > URL > wouldn't work when I copied it because the use all kinds of scripty crap > on > their website. ** Those Osram "Longlife" CFLs do not appear to be on sale here.
BTW
Australia uses the ES26 socket ( same as USA), not the large ES27 as used in UK and Europe.
We also use the bayonet type BC or BC22 very widely.
...... Phil
Chris Jones - 25 Feb 2007 00:37 GMT > "Chris Jones" >> [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] >> fit into some light fittings because they are longer than incandescent >> bulbs. http://www.osram.com/products/general/compact/professionals/dulux_longlife.html
> ** LOL !! > [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > ...... Phil I see you have also spotted the same dodgy maths that I just noticed in my post on abse. The ones I am using are bayonet cap. Thanks for pointing out that there are different screw fittings between Europe and Australia. I only knew that the USA ones were different from Europe.
Chris
Phil Allison - 26 Feb 2007 06:23 GMT "Chris Jones"
> http://www.osram.com/products/general/compact/professionals/dulux_longlife.html ** The 90 mins on and 15 mins off test period gives 105 minutes - OK.
Imagine the dumb copywriter thought it was 105 seconds.
15,000 hours = 54,000,000 seconds.
Divide by 105 = 514,000
Hence the erroneous " 500,000 " on /off cycles claim.
...... Phil
Chris Jones - 26 Feb 2007 21:59 GMT > "Chris Jones" http://www.osram.com/products/general/compact/professionals/dulux_longlife.html
> ** The 90 mins on and 15 mins off test period gives 105 minutes - OK. > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > ...... Phil Yes, that might explain it, but on the box it says something different again: 165 minutes on and 15 minutes off, translated into no less than 25 languages!
I would just put it down to the behaviour of a typical marketing department. The bulbs are still good anyhow...
Chris
David L. Jones - 26 Feb 2007 06:37 GMT On Feb 23, 7:59 am, "Marc" <marcwolf123_killthespam@killthespam_yahoo.com> wrote:
> >........... > [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > Marc Hi Marc I have GE and Mirrabella branded ones that are full brightness from switch on, with no flicker. Have had them for 3.5 years now, and no sign of fading. In fact have never had a CFL of mine fade.
Sorry, don't remember the brand of the one that's done over 8000hours, it's in a previous house.
Dave :)
Mr.T - 26 Feb 2007 07:50 GMT > I have GE and Mirrabella branded ones that are full brightness from > switch on, with no flicker. Have had them for 3.5 years now, and no > sign of fading. In fact have never had a CFL of mine fade. Funny, Mirrabella have been the worst IME, but as has already been pointed out, the brand name bears little correlation to the tube construction or even what factory it came out of. I certainly wish I had as much luck with them as you though!
MrT.
David L. Jones - 26 Feb 2007 10:32 GMT > > I have GE and Mirrabella branded ones that are full brightness from > > switch on, with no flicker. Have had them for 3.5 years now, and no [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > even what factory it came out of. > I certainly wish I had as much luck with them as you though! Yes, I know people who have got some Mirabella's and they take a bit of time to warm up. It does seem to vary immensely.
I've got about half a dozen different brands around my house, and have been exclusively CFL for about 10 years now, and I've had pretty good luck. Only one dead one out of the box from memory, no fading that I have noticed, and only a few that have died prematurely (within a year or two).
I buy whatever brand is available at the shop that a)physically fits, has the right colour temp, the right rating, and the right fitting. Often there is only one choice available that fits all the requirements.
The warm up thing doesn't really bother me in most cases, but I hate ones that flicker at switch on. The Megaman halogen ones do this, but because they are outside it's not a big deal. Shame really because the MegaMan ones have the nicest light of any other brand I've tried, very smooth and cool looking pure white.
Dave :)
rowan194 - 23 Feb 2007 04:36 GMT > I'm using some of these new Megaman 11W Halogen replacement ones and > they claim 15,000 hours.http://www.neco.com.au/product.asp?pID=168&cID=47http://www.megamanuk.com/techno logy/ingenium.php > They do take a long time to warm up though, worst than any other CFL I > have tried. Bummer. I was hoping to fit out our new house almost exclusively with that item (or similar Megaman CFL product), but the "cold light = dim light" effect really bugs me.
BTW, is the CFL the same length as a standard halogen globe fitting, or does it protrude below the ceiling level?
kreed - 26 Feb 2007 23:46 GMT > Hi All, > [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > (To get email address ROT 13) > ebff_q...@lnubb.pbz in recent years, We have used a large number of CFL's in our work. In all cases they were australian 240v CFL's being run from 120v, inside sockets mounted in imported US made equipment (too expensive to get 120v bulbs, which had a short life anyway - and too much hassle to rewire dozens of sockets for 240v). Most CFLs will happily start and run on a 120v supply without any noticeable drop in performance.
(note: one advantage no-one here has mentioned is that CFL's seem to be really good at handling voltage drops, and I would recommend using them in areas where you have brown-outs etc.)
We used GE brand 18W CFL's that were sold by big W at the time (2001), and were "guaranteed 3 year life".
In all cases they would be run for about 10 hours a day, 7 days a week, and were quite reliable. The first round of failures occured at about 3 years, where about 30% of the CFL's had died and since then about 40% of the original units are still running, though brightness has reduced.
Have replaced them recently with Philips units that are stocked at Haymans, however the "Fairway" brand units that are sold dirt cheap at our local Bunnings also work fine, but dont seem to give out as much light in my opinion. Too early yet to give an opinion on their usable life though.
------------------------------------------------ out of interest: The first I can remember of "CFL's" was in the mid 1980's when a collegue obtained a couple of them. In those days they cost about $25 to buy, (which is probably close to $50 in today's $) and the entire tube was encased in what looked like a big glass "jar" and probably sealed ? They took several minutes from power-on to come up to full brightness, but after that they worked well, and produced plenty of usable light.
At the time, I can remember thinking they were a bit of a waste of time - mainly because of the cost, because a 40w batten could be bought for less than that, the tube could be replaced for about $2, and probably did the job as well or better, as well as starting within seconds at normal room temperature.
Imagine my surprise when visiting there about a year ago, and seeing that he had one of them still in use as an outside light ! He claimed that the light had not failed in that time, but it was only being used for about 2 hours 2 nights a week (usually only used on weekends when they were using the outdoor area).
The time it takes to get to any usable brightness is annoying though.
Phil Allison - 27 Feb 2007 01:49 GMT "kreed"
> in recent years, We have used a large number of CFL's in our work. In > all cases they were australian 240v CFL's being run from 120v, inside > sockets mounted in imported US made equipment (too expensive to get > 120v bulbs, which had a short life anyway - and too much hassle to > rewire dozens of sockets for 240v). Most CFLs will happily start and > run on a 120v supply without any noticeable drop in performance. ** That last claim just ain't true.
The light output of a CFL varies closely in proportion to the AC supply voltage - so at 120 volts AC the output is half what it is at 240 volts AC.
Tested several I have here and found the rms current draw remains constant over the range from 120 to 240 but the reading on a lux meter doubles. The colour does not alter.
> (note: one advantage no-one here has mentioned is that CFL's seem to > be really good at handling voltage drops, and I would recommend using > them in areas where you have brown-outs etc.) ** Yep, the light output of an incandesce bulb is a much more dramatic function of applied voltage than with a CFL - and the colour changes a lot too.
BTW:
One more ISSUE with CFLs is they are sensitive to ambient temperature.
Even the "No Frills" one that starts instantly with close to full light output is a real SLUG to start and deliver light when cooled to around freezing temp first.
This can be a serious problem in certain situations ( very cold weather / inside a cool room , forcing folk to leave CFLs on 24/7 to avoid the warm up delay.
No such issue with incandescent bulbs at all of course.
....... Phil
Friday - 27 Feb 2007 02:16 GMT > "kreed" > [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > > ....... Phil Phil how do the CFLs handle over voltage? Does it compromise their longevity to the same degree as an incandescent lamp? Have you seen any data on this?
Friday
Phil Allison - 27 Feb 2007 03:08 GMT "Friday"
> Phil how do the CFLs handle over voltage? Does it compromise their > longevity to the same degree as an incandescent lamp? Have you seen any > data on this? ** What a stupid question.
It falsely presumes that CFLs are all alike.
........ Phil
Friday - 27 Feb 2007 08:51 GMT > "Friday" > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > ........ Phil I didn't presume anything, I asked because I didn't know. If I knew I wouldn't have asked. I was giving you a chance to expound your vast knowledge.
Phil Allison - 27 Feb 2007 09:28 GMT "Friday" Phil Allison wrote:
>>> Phil how do the CFLs handle over voltage? Does it compromise their >>> longevity to the same degree as an incandescent lamp? Have you seen any [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > I didn't presume anything, ** Fraid you did.
In the first sentence you treat CFLs as a consistent group.
> I asked because I didn't know. ** Do not know what ?
> If I knew I wouldn't have asked. ** Then learn ask questions without false presumptions lying behind them.
Make them impossible to answer.
" Have you stopped beating your wife yet ? "
> I was giving you a chance to expound your vast knowledge. ** Well aware it was an asinine attempt at a trap question.
..... Phil
Bob Parker - 27 Feb 2007 04:46 GMT > One more ISSUE with CFLs is they are sensitive to ambient temperature. > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > ....... Phil That's what I've found with all of them too. It applies to ordinary tubular fluorescents too, but not as much in my experience. All my fluoros in the depths of winter start noticeably dim and slowly come up to normal brilliance. It's because when cold, the mercury vapour condenses on the inside of the glass and needs a bit of heat to vaporize it again, isn't it?
Bob
|
|
|